NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 61,769
- Likes
- 90,320
I agree, except that you've been one of the worst here in accusing people with that kind of logic, Mr. 30 Pieces of Silver, You're a Fake Christian if you support ICE.I'm turning his logic against him, not professing to have the same stupid logic. Come on, man. Keep up
If you support ICE, you endorse all the rapes and murders and felonies they do, on and off duty.
See how stupid you are?
If you can point to one who has done one of these heinous acts, I will be in support of the law taking them in. Which isn’t the stance you’re taking on those ICE is arresting. So again, if you don’t support ICE you're endorsing those they are getting.If you support ICE, you endorse all the rapes and murders and felonies they do, on and off duty.
See how stupid you are?
Their training was shortened to 47 days to reflect the 47th president. Evidence of ICE misbehaving is all over the place
I asked this with the "ICE is breaking down doors illegally" and have yet to find any answer with actual evidence of thisMe looking for said “evidence”
View attachment 809576
Please cite the relevant section of the constitution you feel is being subverted. Bonus points for any court finding supporting your contention.Somebody tweeted that her Cheesecake Factory job made her shadow for 3 weeks before she was allowed to put bread on the table.
But the gripes about training completely miss the bigger picture. Even if the training were better and they were more competent, the directives are still subverting the constitution. The ineptitude is drawing attention to the constutional defiance.
You literally were given an example of forced entry and you immediately parsed it to “but they didn’t break down the door” you’re a clown and you really need to sit this one out.I asked this with the "ICE is breaking down doors illegally" and have yet to find any answer with actual evidence of this
There was no actual evidence except the "victim's" uncorroborated statement and a picture of a fully fine non-damaged doorYou literally were given an example of forced entry and you immediately parsed it to “but they didn’t break down the door” you’re a clown and you really need to sit this one out.
That was (D)ifferentCan you help me remeber which administration THIS occurred under? I am drawing a blank
View attachment 809583
That was absolutely BS and wrong too. Next useless deflection?Can you help me remeber which administration THIS occurred under? I am drawing a blank
View attachment 809583
