Too much ice

We've been through nationalist eras before, and they've ended. Thinking this is some permanent victory suggests you're 12 years old

It must be painful for you seeing Trump's foreign policy successes (hint: that's plural not singular). All Americans should celebrate this given this is a very dangerous world. They are too numerous and many are well documented. Some may or may not happen like this Venezuelan situation but we just also took out a big Cuban oil resource along with enforcing the Monroe/Donroe Doctrine. The world still remains a tender box but it is clear Trump is considered a strong leader to the world and respected. Another hint, respect amd liked are two different things.

Instead you respond like an emotional jilted teenage girl on the rag who wrote Justin Bieber and he didn't respond. The fact that you spend an endless amount of time on the board says you're either unemployed or ripping off your employer. I suspect you're an old neo-liberal with dreams of grandeur that you would live long enough to see the your American Bolshevik Revolution happen. Admittedly with mass illegal immigration, the state media, control of education, Hollywood, true believer demagogue activists have a lot of reason to think anarchy, fascism, and socialism is reasonably achievable. Like China and terrorists, progressives think long-term if you guys can just continue to gain an inch but take a foot.
 
Ice would be seen in a more favorable light of they concentrated on the bad ones first instead of fields and home Depot

Home runs are great, but I'm not going to complain about stringing together a bunch of singles and doubles either. A hit is a hit, after all.

......we would be speaking Cherokee

That's kind of the point, though, isn't it? This country has been far too frivolous with respect to legal immigration, let alone illegal immigration. I'd rather not lose like the Native Americans did, thank you, but that's just me!

Can we all agree that the "domestic terrorist" narrative pushed by the admin is garbage? Or no?

It's hyperbolic at the very least. Even if this woman was part of an anti-ICE activist group, which appears to be the case, that's still a far cry from domestic terrorism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Swamp, go back and watch the videos please. I believe you are missing the Agent in front of the car. I took me a few times to analyze and notice that there were two officers near the car. I was shell shocked and very angry at first thinking that the woman was shot by the officer outside the driver door. He is blocking the videos view of the officer out front.
I have seen that very clearly. He was filming her with his cell phone camera. When she put the car in forward gear he drew his weapon and leaned on her hood and fired his first shot. Her car was turned to the right and as it moved forward he stepped to the side and fired onemore thru her window. Running beside the car he fired a third shot.
 
This is why I’ll be excited to watch public education be replaced by school vouchers.
There are reasons no one respects "educators" now....because they have no real world life experience and think they "know" things.

Imagine the state of public schools now and how educated students turn out and where it was simply 30 years ago, let alone 50.

Embarrassing
 
Gassed it?? Moving 1mph? And no Mr gullible she did not hit him.
In the videos, you can see her tires spin. There is video of her vehicle making contact. It's in this thread repeatedly. The last counter I saw was claiming that the latest video showing it was sped up to make the contact look more violent, but I don't think many are denying contact anymore.

I'm not saying she intended to hit or harm him. I'm on record saying that I actually doubt she even saw the agent she hit. But yet again, you are denying facts that have been known for some time.
 
There are reasons no one respects "educators" now....because they have no real world life experience and think they "know" things.

Imagine the state of public schools now and how educated students turn out and where it was simply 30 years ago, let alone 50.

Embarrassing

Yep. The man is only promoting the idea that it’s okay to interfere with law enforcement, drive your car directly at them when asked to stop, and if they harm you it’s their fault.

Must be nice to remain in that wildly insulated world
 
What are you, a wokester now? Should I have said unalived? Kill is kill, don't be so obtuse.
Contesting your definition of killed. You portray him as a murderer, which is irresponsible. She was a paid observer to be there to interfere. She was not an innocent bystander.
 
Yep. The man is only promoting the idea that it’s okay to interfere with law enforcement, drive your car directly at them when asked to stop, and if they harm you it’s their fault.

Must be nice to remain in that wildly insulated world
Too many Leftists think that Free Speech from the Right is violence and actual violence from the Left is Free Speech
 
No one would have died if she were not being paid to be an agitator and interfering with police operations.
From a legal and civil standard, fault usually lies more in the person that is doing something illegal to begin with. This is why so few people "win" court cases or civil cases against law enforcement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
This is the way this thread seems to be running:

Convervatives: "She did not deserve to die, but she contributed to the circumstances leading to her death. It was not murder. The ICE agent was justified because the circumstances gave him the right to self-defense."

Leftists: "It was murder! Murder! She was as pure as the wind-driven snow and had nothing to do with the protests or interfering with ICE. Did we mention she was murdered?"
 
It was tongue in cheek, satirizing the liberal responses over the years:

"Being born black should not be a death penalty."

"Merely driving your SUV should not be a death penalty."

"if you don't want to get run over, don't stand in front of an SUV..." Wait, not that one...


It's a **** way to try to have conversations--removing all the nuance for political capital.
yeah I don't see you calling it out from the right when they are doing it.

the cop put himself in the way of a vehicle he wanted moved. its counterproductive at best. and an important nuance that is ignored.

one cop, or more, tells her to move, another is stopping her with his body, so they decide they get to arrest her for not obeying one of them, and a civilian gets shot because the cops put her in an impossible situation.
 
So you have not seen the video where the vehicle hits him.

Trick question?

theyre-the-same-picture-the-office.gif
 
What????????? Are you serious??? They violated multiple Native American "laws".
LOL sure they did, because they didn't worship the Earth? or because they didn't participate in child sacrifice and incest?

There was no "Native American" country here, and no actual governmental laws, just a bunch of nomadic stone age tribes
 

Advertisement



Back
Top