Too much ice

#2,102
#2,102
etsuvol13 said:
Oh yeah, gotcha, protesting something you disagree with means you should stay home. Gotcha. On those terms are you and your likes ready to see Ashley Babbitt was a far right extremist? Should she have stayed home?
Click to expand...
Absolutely she should have stayed home. Protesting something you disagree with but block police all day and the trying to run them over isn't protesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and MAD
#2,103
#2,103
utvolpj said:
Where have I ever said that?

Ice would be seen in a more favorable light of they concentrated on the bad ones first instead of fields and home Depot
Click to expand...
The feds asked for liberal sanctuary cities to turn over ice detainer prisoners in their jails. They refused. The feds have continuously if you don't we will have to come in after them. Your sanctuary cities caused this. Now your sanctuary cities have proven to be riddled with huge fraud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeeohdeeWood
#2,106
#2,106
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Nice of the radical disgusting democrats to think of Noem.
Click to expand...

Call to action. It’s time for these p***ies to learn freedom of speech isn’t freedom from consequence. "incitement" to kill someone is considered a call to action in a legal context and is punishable under federal and state laws. This type of speech is not protected by the First Amendment right to free speech.

Insurrection Time.

Oh and I’m glad I googled who is Kristi Noem, she’s bad.
 
#2,110
#2,110
allstar34 said:
That’s what ICE did @luthervol. That psycho white lady tried to run him over.
Click to expand...
That's one point you're wrong about. Looking at video from different angles show her car was.pointed away from the killer. It's doubtful her car touched him. The killer stepped in front of the car, jot the other way around. She was trying to leave and was murdered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#2,112
#2,112
AI Response based on Precedent.
Yes, protesters chanting threats like “Kristi Noem will hang” could potentially face legal trouble, but it depends on context, intent, and how authorities interpret it under U.S. law.

True Threats vs. Protected Speech

The First Amendment protects a lot of heated political rhetoric, even if it’s offensive or hyperbolic (e.g., chants like “Killer Kristi” or signs criticizing officials, which appeared in reports from this protest). However, true threats — statements where a reasonable person would interpret them as a serious expression of intent to inflict harm — are not protected and can be criminal.

• Federal law (18 U.S.C. § 871) prohibits threats against the President, but for Cabinet officials like the DHS Secretary, it’s covered under broader statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 115 (threatening federal officials) or state

• The Supreme Court case Watts v. United States (1969) distinguished hyperbolic protest speech (protected) from true threats (not). More recently, Counterman v. Colorado (2023) requires that the speaker at least recklessly disregards the risk of causing fear.

Chanting “Kristi Noem will hang” in a large crowd could be seen as:

• Political hyperbole → especially if framed as condemnation (e.g., calling for justice or accountability), similar to historical protest chants.

• A true threat → if it’s specific, direct, and perceived as inciting imminent violence, particularly since Noem is a high-profile federal official overseeing controversial ICE operations.

The additional chant “Save a life, kill ICE” (or variations like “kill an ICE”) is more ambiguous — “ICE” refers to the agency, not individual agents necessarily — but could be interpreted as inciting violence against federal officers, which is a serious crime (e.g., under assault on federal officers statutes).
 
#2,113
#2,113
swampfoxfan said:
That's one point you're wrong about. Looking at video from different angles show her car was.pointed away from the killer. It's doubtful her car touched him. The killer stepped in front of the car, jot the other way around. She was trying to leave and was murdered.
Click to expand...
Uh huh. 👍 That's how the uneducated delusional libs like you see it happening.
 
#2,115
#2,115
swampfoxfan said:
That's one point you're wrong about. Looking at video from different angles show her car was.pointed away from the killer. It's doubtful her car touched him. The killer stepped in front of the car, jot the other way around. She was trying to leave and was murdered.
Click to expand...
IMG_4583.gif

Explain. Those wheels are going straight forward right at him when he draws
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, MemphisVol77, Behr and 3 others
#2,121
#2,121
swampfoxfan said:
Explain the vehicle never touched him.
Explain why he circled the vehicle to get in front of it.
Explain why he didn't step far away
Click to expand...
Excuse, excuse, excuse. She made her bed.
Stop promoting this garbage. She’s dead because she made a decision that could have cost the Ice officer his life.

You can’t pause time. She made a terrible decision, which im sure is a usual occurrence for her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaybird_1981, GroverCleveland and Carl Pickens
#2,122
#2,122
swampfoxfan said:
Explain the vehicle never touched him.
Explain why he circled the vehicle to get in front of it.
Explain why he didn't step far away.
Click to expand...

There is no way any serious person can not understand why that officer thought he was under threat. He has the right to end that threat. Sorry. She's as dumb as Babbitt
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188 and whodeycin85
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top