Too much ice

[Orangeslice13]

I want to do my part to support the greatest, most honest, most generous, most energetic, most sexually pure President of all time: Donald J. Trump.

Could somebody please explain what my stance is supposed to be on rhetoric causing violence? I was pretty sure we said that definitely wasn’t a thing after January 6.

I’m just waiting the same standard applied across the board.
If Maxine Waters wasn’t guilty of encouraging violence then neither was Trump. Or……as I feel……their both guilty.

It is interesting watching people change their opinions based on which tribe were talking about.

 

[LSU-SIU]

View attachment 811821

Oh sure what? Yeah it was just a Democrat thing. That crap has been going on for decades you nut.

Heck, you guys aren't even keeping up with the reproduction rate right now.

 

[Majors]

I’m just waiting the same standard applied across the board.
If Maxine Waters wasn’t guilty of encouraging violence then neither was Trump. Or……as I feel……their both guilty.

It is interesting watching people change their opinions based on which tribe were talking about.

Valid…and proper use of reverse UNO.
Well played.

 

[RockyTop85]

I’m just waiting the same standard applied across the board.
If Maxine Waters wasn’t guilty of encouraging violence then neither was Trump. Or……as I feel……their both guilty.

It is interesting watching people change their opinions based on which tribe were talking about.

If you think Trump is guilty of anything other than being incredible then you have TDS.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Yep, and the other Fascism

Seriously? You're better than this

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Seriously? You're better than this

You would think so wouldn't you?

 

[NorthDallas40]

When they follow them to their hotels and threaten reporters who aren’t even ICE, that’s a problem.

Then why aren’t they being arrested.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Ywa it does and that statute says it clear English. Were good we won't agree on this

Oh I read that statute. Cue the stretch Armstrong gif

 

[NorthDallas40]

Wtf are you babbling about...I have the PA example...that agent was shot because the agent was being stalked...by your logic that that person was just doing their 1a right till they pulled the trigger..we won't agree thanks for the talk

That case is a false equivalence. WTF are you babbling about. That case did a helluva lot more than “stalking”

 

[NorthDallas40]

So is this incorrect

AI Overview

Yes,
law enforcement officers (LEOs) can arrest you for following them if your actions constitute stalking, harassment, or a violation of traffic laws. While observing police in public is generally legal, creating a "credible threat" to safety, tailgating, or causing a disturbance can lead to charges like disorderly conduct or stalking.
Key considerations regarding following law enforcement:

• Stalking/Harassment: Following someone, including an officer, multiple times or in a manner that causes fear for their safety can be considered a criminal offense, often defined as a "course of conduct".
• Traffic Violations: If following in a vehicle, you must obey all traffic laws. Tailgating, shining high beams, or driving erratically to keep up with a police cruiser is illegal.
• Disorderly Conduct: If your behavior interferes with their duties, it may result in charges of disorderly conduct or obstructing an officer.
• Public vs. Private: While you have more freedom to observe in public spaces, following an officer onto private property or into restricted areas can lead to immediate arrest.

In short, while you can watch the police, doing so in a way that is threatening, obstructive, or illegal can lead to your arrest.

Same question to you then. Why are they being arrested? I’m unimpressed by the AI because the bar clearly hasn’t been passed.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Then why aren’t they being arrested.

You should know that answer before you ask it.
Its easy as a caveman to know why.

 

[NorthDallas40]

You should know that answer before you ask it.
Its easy as a caveman to know why.

Then tell me Mr Intellectual Caveman

 

[NorthDallas40]

The bottom line is they’re wasting time energy and good will protesting the wrong people. I’ve is doing a job. Protesting against law enforcement enforcing the law is going to change absolutely nothing.

Now if they want to follow around law makers and protest those guys to change the laws then they might actually change things. The irony of this is the people who could actually fix things and should be protested are the people encouraging the protestors to go after ice.


But if they fix this problem they won’t have this issue to distract from the money stolen from taxpayers

Slice I think they’ll get more meaningful results pissing in the wind. But I’ve seen nothing showing they are breaking the law. So they’re free to do so. And even use technology to coordinate their efforts. The case is clearly outlined where it’s no longer ok. They can’t interfere or threaten that absolutely crosses the line. But wasting their time following ICE around isn’t illegal.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Then tell me Mr Intellectual Caveman

You should already know it. You aren't that stupid. I'm not spending
hours here in a dumb discussion on a ? that shouldn't be asked. You
are just looking to argue over silly stuff. Now dance for me silly boi.

 

[NorthDallas40]

You should already know it. You aren't that stupid. I'm not spending
hours here in a dumb discussion on a ? that shouldn't be asked. You
are just looking to argue over silly stuff. Now dance for me silly boi.

Ok so you have no idea. Got it.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Slice think they’ll get more meaningful results pissing in the wind. But I’ve seen nothing showing they are breaking the law. So they’re free to do so. And even use technology to coordinate their efforts. The case is clearly outlined where it’s no longer ok. They can’t interfere or threaten that absolutely crosses the line. But wasting their time following ICE around isn’t illegal.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Ok so you have no idea. Got it.

I see you can't read. I knew that already but you just proved it.

 

[GAVol]

Propaganda on which side, LOL? Do you mean the outright bald faced lies by the entire Trump admin?

There is no trust with the feds. They recklessly break the law every day as policy. There is no trust in bill of rights protections right now. They're militarizing our streets with masked agents who pepper spray peaceful protesters that are on the sidewalk. And if they kill our neighbors, they'll do everything they can to get away with it.

But the organized chaos of the resistance....

Buddy, our founders went to war for less. The people are supposed to be organized chaos. That's a great way to explain the market, for example. The government is organized chaos right now, and that's not how it's supposed to be.

Obvious to me that both sides are being worked. Every time Noem or Bondi cut a wrestling promo, I roll my eyes.

 

[n_huffhines]

Bovino told us we would never know

 

[NorthDallas40]

I see you can't read. I knew that already but you just proved it.

Well I read your non answer deflection when I asked you a direct question.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Bovino told us we would never know

View attachment 811829

Are you going to go to their houses now and harass them like your buddis will?

 

[Majors]

Just doing 1A type stuff.

 

[NorthDallas40]

View attachment 811828

 

[n_huffhines]

Obvious to me that both sides are being worked. Every time Noem or Bondi cut a wrestling promo, I roll my eyes.

It was a very confusing use of "but" if you were still talking about ICE when you mentioned propaganda and organized chaos.

And judging by who liked it and who didn't like it, they all took the same meaning as me.

Edit: what happened to your original post?

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Well I read your non answer deflection when I asked you a direct question.

Not spending hrs discussing an answer you already know. That's crazy dude.
You have hours on end & want an argument w/someone on anything and
I refuse to be your huckleberry.