Too much ice

I watched the video... Given I was watching the correct guy as they had 2 on the ground... The one that got for sure sprayed.. Was twisting under the agents while they were still trying to restrain him.. The guy walks over 1 second spurt to the face and the guy stopped .. Now when you considered being surrounded by rioters and being attacked sporadically... It's justified for compliance and safety of both the agents and person being detained.
Always safe to be out of the street or at work.
 
If the person isn't fully restrained, that changes the standard of what is / isn't appropriate. I think getting to a point of legitimate restraint efficiently is imperative for the safety of the officers AND the person being restrained.
With that said, how many officers are required to adequately restrain someone before cuffs or other restraints are applied?
I've seen it take 5 guys but he was yuge.... The answer is as many as needed to be stops.. Hence the spray
 
I said the fascists opposing socialists is a strong indicator that they're not socialists. But we already knew that.
So, your logic is that opposing socialism is a strong indicator that they are not socialists. I countered with the fact that Communists opposed socialism too. Does that make them right-wing as well? Your defeater to that defeater was apparently "No, because they opposed socialists harder!"

Perhaps opposing other forms of socialism isn't the indicator you claimed?

You've literally ignored a mountain of evidence and merely argued by refusing to support your position in favor of a single easily disproven "indicator" and a fallacious argument ad populum.
 
Last edited:
The sheriff hired someone who is an illegal alien to be a corrections officer lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: tim and appvol
I was in Latin America last year and met a super cool guy that had lived in NYC and worked as a NYPD beat cop for decades. Said he'd been undocumented the entire time, lol.
That's because in large Blue cities, the background check for LEO is so bad, they are now sometimes allowing illegals, former gang members, drug addicts and former dealers, etc.

It's bad in some areas, that's what happened with the Memphis scandal, because 5 of those 7 guys were former gang members and had personal beef with the guy they killed
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
I searched to validate something I saw on IG and it came up with 3 stories. It's amazing to me that overreach, over-spending, bloat, defiance of the bill of rights, violence against innocent civilians, and then follow-up legal costs are all fine in the name of getting rid of brown people.

Good luck explaining all this to Jesucristo.

1000041682.jpg
 

Advertisement



Back
Top