Too much ice

[Rickyvol77]

Lol what? Do Christians automatically support the well-known pedophile ring in their church?

Muhammed was a pedophile himself

 

[Rickyvol77]

The guy people in this thread are crying over lol. What happened to FAFO?

You support people being assaulted for their political opinions?

 

[rekinhavoc]

Here's an idea:

Open a hot chocolate stand on the route to the protest.

 

[rekinhavoc]

Call him out for his rhetoric.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Imagine these actual fascists harassing and assaulting normal everyday people because they look like successful healthy white males

 

[Ritzwatch]

This is what the "willing suspension of disbelief" looks like when it occurs in real time.

Sure it is, Betsy. Only it is happening.

 

[NashVol11]

 

[Majors]

You couldn't tell me who I'm "bigoted" against if your life depended on it. This was such a waste of time all because you felt the need to defend a neo-Nazi from being correctly called a bigot

Yes, I called him a bigot as well as you. Not sure you understand the term defending. We can’t revisit the original thread of you endorsing Jews being targeted on Columbia’s Campus. But we can see you’ve failed to speak out against Zoharan wanting to target “white neighborhoods”. Guess I get to live on.

 

[NashVol11]

Yes, I called him a bigot as well as you. Not sure you understand the term defending. We can’t revisit the original thread of you endorsing Jews being targeted on Columbia’s Campus. But we can see you’ve failed to speak out against Zoharan wanting to target “white neighborhoods”. Guess I get to live on.

Neither of those things happened and you didn't answer like I said, so RIP and good riddance. Neo-Nazis will have to find a new spokesperson when you're gone

 

[Majors]

Neither of those things happened and you didn't answer like I said, so RIP and good riddance. Neo-Nazis will have to find a new spokesperson when you're gone

For a guy posing as a smart guy, you forget a lot. I can point to my post of saying “I don’t care for the guy.” But you unfortunately, time has past. But you’re sweet for trying to put labels on me.

 

[NashVol11]

For a guy posing as a smart guy, you forget a lot. I can point to my post of saying “I don’t care for the guy.” But you unfortunately, time has past. But you’re sweet for trying to get the put labels on me.

I wouldn't recommend pointing to that, considering the "but" that immediately followed it. I said a neo-Nazi was a bigot and you took issue with that, trying to nonsensically defend him with the "First Amendment" that doesn't remotely apply to this. Quit while you're behind

I don’t personally care for the guy, but aren’t we first amendment people here or not? Can’t pick and choose.

 

[NashVol11]

time has past

"Viscous" to mean vicious was bad enough but this is another low, and should be my sign to stop arguing with idiots

 

[Majors]

"Viscous" to mean vicious was bad enough but this is another low, and should be my sign to stop arguing with idiots

Now we are going back to misspellings. Never claimed to be a smartest board, or boast GPA/test scores, but I do excel at exposing you and your weakness. Now that we’ve established the difference in vicious and viscous, I noticed you didn’t retract the articles you linked from WAPO on the death of the rapist of the 11 year old. Since you want to assign labels, is it fair to say you sympathize with child rapist?

 

[norrislakevol]

Call him out for his rhetoric.

He's throwing out red meat to the liberal wacko voters. Totally unenforceable. 1) Would be barred from enforcing it in court. 2) Would open up himself and any California PD officers that try to enforce it to obstruction charges.

 

[appvol]

For a guy posing as a smart guy, you forget a lot. I can point to my post of saying “I don’t care for the guy.” But you unfortunately, time has past. But you’re sweet for trying to get the put labels on me.

Don’t think he knows what the definition of bigot means. Technically if you go by the definition we all can be bigots sometimes. This definitely defines Nash

“: a narrow-minded person who obstinately adheres to their own opinions and prejudices”

 

[Orange_Crush]

Interesting example of the terrible feedback loops that are created when you erroneously demonize a group to the uneducated.

 

[BreatheUT]

Did you just need to feel heard on this, or are you trying to disprove anything in the post you quoted?

At the end of the day, it was founded as a Christian nation while protecting the citizens from demands that they be Christians, or even specific types of Christians.

They are just saying what the progressive group think lesson plan documented.

 

[Orange_Crush]

They are just saying what the progressive group think lesson plan documented.

He actually followed up with a compelling argument for why I was being far too lazy with my vocabulary.

There is a difference between "founded as a Christian nation with religious protections", and "founded on Christian principals by mostly Christian men, who would have had the express expectation at the time of the country's founding that Christianity would be the driving belief that fueled our culture and political decisions".

I am personally willing to concede the point, as it's not semantics but beneficial precision in language that will hopefully prove beneficial in thought.

Perhaps most of the founders had a personal, "unofficial" vision for what the nation would remain, within the framework they were creating. That is not the same as "founding as a Christian nation".

If we'd have been founded as a Christian nation, there would likely have been safeguards that kept it that way. They chose freedom over safeguards, which I am glad for. They founded it (likely) with the belief that it'd remain what its initial (unofficial?) vision was, but implemented in such a way that We The People could allow it to evolve (in that sector) from their initial vision.

 

[BreatheUT]

Tim Pool: 'This is not a protest, this is not a riot, these are political extremists' | Fox News Video

Host of ‘Timcast’ Tim Pool breaks down the Minneapolis unrest following multiple I.C.E.‑involved shootings and the rising debate over political extremism fueling protests across the city on ‘Jesse Watters Primetime.’

www.foxnews.com

Tim Pool: 'This is not a protest, this is not a riot, these are political extremists'​

Host of ‘Timcast’ Tim Pool breaks down the Minneapolis unrest following multiple I.C.E.‑involved shootings and the rising debate over political extremism fueling protests across the city on ‘Jesse Watters Primetime.’

 

[BreatheUT]

He actually followed up with a compelling argument for why I was being far too lazy with my vocabulary.

There is a difference between "founded as a Christian nation with religious protections", and "founded on Christian principals by mostly Christian men, who would have had the express expectation at the time of the country's founding that Christianity would be the driving belief that fueled our culture and political decisions".

I am personally willing to concede the point, as it's not semantics but beneficial precision in language that will hopefully prove beneficial in thought.

If we'd have been founded as a Christian nation, there would likely have been safeguards that kept it that way. They chose freedom over safeguards, which I am glad for. They founded it (likely) with the belief that it'd remain what its initial (unofficial?) vision was, but implemented in such a way that We The People could allow it to evolve (in that sector) from their initial vision.

Great clarity with nuance. That one idea I do agree. I didn't keep following the conversation through.

 

[ButchPlz]

Don't know anything about this guy but these videos are hilarious (with a lot of truth):

 

[NashVol11]

Don’t think he knows what the definition of bigot means. Technically if you go by the definition we all can be bigots sometimes. This definitely defines Nash

“: a narrow-minded person who obstinately adheres to their own opinions and prejudices”

Brother, a neo-Nazi is among the most obvious bigots there is. Staggering that MAGA is even attempting to argue otherwise. He said he's not going to sit around while people turn his children into "n****r lovers," what are we doing here

 

[Orange_Crush]

Great clarity with nuance. That one idea I do agree. I didn't keep following the conversation through.

No worries. That reply was MUCH less about you, and much more about me and my initial post. I'd say all but the most fundamentalist would agree with that nuance, so hopefully my laziness and eventual mia copa can help with communication for both "sides".

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Imagine these actual fascists harassing and assaulting normal everyday people because they look like successful healthy white males

Where in the fascist handbook does it encourage assaulting enforcement agencies, Richard? Enforcement agencies are kind of the backbone of the whole ideology.

These are just idiots who scored a 1/10 on situational assessment.

 

[n_huffhines]

Call him out for his rhetoric.

Not rhetoric!