Too much ice

#2,503
#2,503
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Its good if citizens will comply w/LEO & more than likely nobody will die.
Only when a citizen starts to resist an officer's demand the trouble starts there.
Click to expand...
It's sad she was killed but the simple fact is it's all her own fault.

I can't wrap my head around these people that intentionally track down federal law enforcement operations to go there and try and harass, impede or stop them from doing their jobs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#2,510
#2,510
hog88 said:
In this case, legally yeah.

I mentioned earlier that they should be trained better and with that training some of their leeway needs to go.
Click to expand...
I agree. Also, I believe that psychological examinations/intrusive background checks should be required before being able to become a police officer. Any job that impacts the safety of the public already requires this. What makes an LEO any different?

Also, I think they should be paid better, commensurate with the risks they take interacting with the crazies, lunatics, and criminals out there.

I think this would weed out a lot of the bad ones, but it would also narrow the applicant pool substantially, which is why it'll never happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol and DuckInAPen
#2,513
#2,513
Matt2496 said:
I agree. Also, I believe that psychological examinations/intrusive background checks should be required before being able to become a police officer. Any job that impacts the safety of the public already requires this. What makes an LEO any different?

Also, I think they should be paid better, commensurate with the risks they take interacting with the crazies, lunatics, and criminals out there.

I think this would weed out a lot of the bad ones, but it would also narrow the applicant pool substantially, which is why it'll never happen.
Click to expand...
Now think about what the left is doing. Demonizing law enforcement, trying making it harder to fill positions. Think that may create some unintended consequences?


Hint: My local police forces have had to lower their standards to fill needed positions. I have family in law enforcement, and they are beside themselves about it.
 
#2,521
#2,521
Matt2496 said:
I agree. Also, I believe that psychological examinations/intrusive background checks should be required before being able to become a police officer. Any job that impacts the safety of the public already requires this. What makes an LEO any different?

Also, I think they should be paid better, commensurate with the risks they take interacting with the crazies, lunatics, and criminals out there.

I think this would weed out a lot of the bad ones, but it would also narrow the applicant pool substantially, which is why it'll never happen.
Click to expand...
lol. It has nothing to do with psychology or pay (for the most part). In my area (in the south) an 18 year old can get a ged, pass the required psychological exam, and make over 50k before overtime and the positions still won’t be filled. Thats for just working in a jail. It’s more of a perception issue and I would also say there are fewer people with the required testosterone.
 
#2,525
#2,525
swampfoxfan said:
Like Saint Ashli Babbitt ? Who was peacefully asking permission to enter capital building?accompanied with a couple hundred friends?
Whose family was paid 5mil for her murder murder murder?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure what you're trying to do with this. Ashli Babbitt did the same thing: put herself where her life depended on someone else's decision about her life. However, the actual situations where these two women were shot are vastly different in their nature.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top