No, I didn't miss your point at all. And there are huge differences in active shooter takedowns and an ambush situation. You keep falling back on your infantry training and it's like comparing apples to giraffes. Does...not...apply.
You talk about how piss poor their training is, but you can't tell me exactly what that training consists of. As a matter of fact, it's a sign of a well disciplined team to have those members continue to face outward which keeping their weapons at the ready. Threat or no threat, they are doing the same thing each and every time no matter what. And I'd guarantee you if they took rounds that stone wall would quickly become a friend. But the point you miss, willfully so, is the fact they train a certain way and perform that training in a real world application regardless of circumstances. If you were infantry, you'd know that any squad or platoon leader would love to have a whole group of guys that did exactly what they were trained to do the first time they had to apply it for real.
You and Hog are saying the same thing. But I'll ask this, if the military is moving through an urban area with the potential to run into an armed individual, do they continue to keep their weapons at the low ready? I know you know the answer and you know I do as well.
Point is, this umbrella guy got called in as having a long gun. Probably by a person who could identify a long gun two out of hundred times if he was lucky, but the call came in nonetheless. And in a situation like this you don't know if there's one or more. And you always go in on the assumption that there is "more" than the one. So to be ready while others on your team lowers their own weapons to search said individual is the method of training and response. And this team, other than the finger on the trigger faux pas, looked like many others that have done the same thing for years. Do I support it? Yes as a matter of fact I do. Because if there is more than one out there and they managed to start picking off a team, would you rather them not to be in a position to immediately react? How long does it take you to get from a low ready to a position of engagement?
It's the way they are trained. Have been trained and probably will continue to be trained. There are no sinister "intimidation tactics" at work here. It's performing said training in a real scenario. Go look at any pictures of a tactical team and the way they form up on security halts or taking a perp into custody. I'd almost be willing to bet they are almost identical to what you see in that picture.
I'll admit that back then we were not trained to keep at the low ready in mout. However, depending on threat level we were trained to move in either a traveling or bounding overwatch, using cover.
So tell me this slick. When you go into a crowded urban environment where hostiles are mixed with innocents are you going to go up and over the targets you don't want to shoot?
The answer is no. Your muzzle continues right through that innocent until you get on target and then engage. You will get flagged repeatedly.
Haha seems you should watch the video again.
I may not be a expert ultra cool tactical swat guy, but I do know that in tense situations the last thing I'd want to do is have my weapon pointed at innocents with my damn finger on the trigger. Anyone that advocates such for Leo should immediately lose credibility.
Perhaps that's because you lack the confidence and training to do so.
And you lose.
I dare say the 4 firearm rules have saved millions of lives over the years. They may seem uncool to some but they have their place, and they DO NOT change.
1. Treat all guns as if they're loaded
2. Keep your bugger hook off the bang switch
3. Don't point your weapon at anything you're not willing to destroy.
4. Know your target, and what is behind it.
I'll admit that back then we were not trained to keep at the low ready in mout. However, depending on threat level we were trained to move in either a traveling or bounding overwatch, using cover.
So you self admittedly have never gone through any close quarters training?
They are very good rules of the range. But in a split second, life and death situation, you are not, NOT going to raise or lower your muzzle over a hostage target to get to the bad guy. You will flag innocents. It is UNAVOIDABLE. Because the time you take raising and lowering your weapon, getting back on target and engaging will be precisely the same amount of time the target, who cares not about flagging innocents, will have already fired at you.
I've had a training class or two.
Gunsite
Magpul dynamics
Thunder Ranch
Shootrite academy
You seriously need to rethink this man. If you've been trained this way then please advise, so I will not attend this instructor and waste my money.
You don't point your weapon at anything you're not willing to destroy period. Those rules do not change.
The only time I can see what you're advocating is when you know the threat and have him/her in your sights and a clear line of sight.
As a reminder, I believe the SOP back in your day (and the beginning of mine as well) was to hurl a grenade through an open window and spray the interior with burst/auto before entry.
Brief nostalgic moment of dangling on a rope trying to pull the pin on a grenade and toss it in that second floor window in the MOUT village lol
Ok, just be sure you don't slip and fall with your finger on the trigger. lulzYou do it your way, I'll do it mine.
Two day entry class taught by members of the Denver FBI Regional SWAT
Colorado Springs SWAT taught a three day class in dynamic entry/room clearing
Army SRT week long school Mobile Training Team
I too can list classes.
