To Protect and to Serve...

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,703
#1,703
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,705
#1,705
#1,707
#1,707
#1,712
#1,712
tim said:
Not sure I saw anything wrong here. The punches are meant to force compliance. In this case he was obviously not putting his hands behind his back. Life is brutal and I ask. What would you propose in this situation?
Click to expand...

Should've just executed him and called it self defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#1,713
#1,713
tim said:
Not sure I saw anything wrong here. The punches are meant to force compliance. In this case he was obviously not putting his hands behind his back. Life is brutal and I ask. What would you propose in this situation?
Click to expand...

They also tased him twice with no affect.
 
#1,714
#1,714
tim said:
Not sure I saw anything wrong here. The punches are meant to force compliance. In this case he was obviously not putting his hands behind his back. Life is brutal and I ask. What would you propose in this situation?
Click to expand...

You consider that "resistance" worthy of being bludgeoned in the head repeatedly?
 
#1,715
#1,715
tim said:
Not sure I saw anything wrong here. The punches are meant to force compliance. In this case he was obviously not putting his hands behind his back. Life is brutal and I ask. What would you propose in this situation?
Click to expand...

Compliance with what? You can state that without even knowing the charge or reason for arrest? Amazing
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,716
#1,716
tim said:
Not sure I saw anything wrong here. The punches are meant to force compliance. In this case he was obviously not putting his hands behind his back. Life is brutal and I ask. What would you propose in this situation?
Click to expand...

I don't know, but back in the day, police were taught submission holds that didn't require punches in the head. Something about wanting to avoid police brutality law suits. I remember one of my father's sergeants, a female about 5'2" who demonstrated putting a 6'3" man into submission using an arm lock and night stick. Most of these recent videos involve taking the accused to the ground and forcing compliance through fist strikes. Is that current training?

Then again, a 5'2" woman couldn't get through the recruitment today so maybe it is an attitude thing. No way she was going to use punches to subdue anyone, so she had to rely on other techniques. Maybe our current population is more confident in their punching ability.
 
#1,720
#1,720
tim said:
Not sure I saw anything wrong here. The punches are meant to force compliance. In this case he was obviously not putting his hands behind his back. Life is brutal and I ask. What would you propose in this situation?
Click to expand...

I think any time police escalate a non-violent situation to a violent one, they are doing a great job.

There is no point for you to post in this thread. You're the only person who doesn't realize you can't look at issues related to cops with any degree of fairness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,722
#1,722
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,723
#1,723
n_huffhines said:
I think any time police escalate a non-violent situation to a violent one, they are doing a great job.

There is no point for you to post in this thread. You're the only person who doesn't realize you can't look at issues related to cops with any degree of fairness.
Click to expand...

Did you read the article? I think you're the one eager to jump to conclusions. The punches were not haymakers they were punches to sensitve areas meant to cause a combative person to comply without wrenching an arm and breaking bones. You and people like you are so predictable. Apparently you've never been in a real altercation because if you had you would know that those punches were NOT how you try to bludgeon someone.
 
#1,725
#1,725
YorkVol said:
I don't know, but back in the day, police were taught submission holds that didn't require punches in the head. Something about wanting to avoid police brutality law suits. I remember one of my father's sergeants, a female about 5'2" who demonstrated putting a 6'3" man into submission using an arm lock and night stick. Most of these recent videos involve taking the accused to the ground and forcing compliance through fist strikes. Is that current training?

Then again, a 5'2" woman couldn't get through the recruitment today so maybe it is an attitude thing. No way she was going to use punches to subdue anyone, so she had to rely on other techniques. Maybe our current population is more confident in their punching ability.
Click to expand...

Lol. Im from back in the day. This is not anything like what he would have received "back in the day"... Training and techniques dont include chokes and a stick up side his head.
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top