MercyPercy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
- Messages
- 9,133
- Likes
- 9,051
I will admit I have seen some decent cops and I have also seen some power drunk monsters.
I've never liked the assumed guilt that cops use. Say you get pulled over, chances are you'll be asked, do you have any drugs or guns in the car. So a traffic violation automatically makes someone a criminal?
Problem being is that is not limited to just LEO. That can (and often will) be in any kind of position of authority be it in government or private sector.
Technically....yes. It IS a violation. Criminal is a loose term though. Having said that to say this, I'd be willing to bet half the traffic stops I've done in my time were what we called fishing expeditions. You find a headlight out, you are being polite in advising said driver to replace said headlight. And by the way, did you happen to know you have a felony warrant out of Arizona for aggravated assault and domestic battery? Can you step out of the car with your hands over your head?
Otherwise, please replace said headlight and have a good night.
The obvious answer to an officer that asks the questions of "guns/drugs" is no. And the answer to the follow up question of "can I search your vehicle" is, again, no. But being polite, don't aggravate the situation, polite compliance with the demands that can be made (license, registration, etc) and polite declining of those demands that are not legal (searches of vehicles).
Glad you used that term not me "fishing expedition"
Stopping someone for a broken tail light does not give you probable cause to search someone's vehicle. We know the drill though, "I think I smell weed" or better yet if it's a k9 cop just get the dog to give a false alert. Right?
Good points. But then again, as we've discussed, how many people actually know their rights? More times than not, the guy/gal gets the conviction.
It's really unbelievable how policing would change if we simply legalized drugs. As a former cop, I guess you are, what percentage of our prison population would you guess were locked up for drugs or drug related offenses?
I would honestly say a good 60-70% of people in prison today are there because of the drug war.
Until we treat drug addiction as the medical condition it truly is, we will continue to be the country with the highest incarceration rate in the world.
United States incarceration rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If there is no victim, there is no crime.
I would imagine driving while stoned will be tested the same way DUI stops are now.
I actually read an article the other day where some government agency was testing limits. Yes, they were getting people high and letting them use a driving simulator lol
Can't find the link.
Legalization is just around the corner I feel.
I'm not a drug user btw
I can neither confirm or deny former use though lol
To me, there's more to it than legalization though. It's not an easy mountain to climb I'll agree. But there will be unintended consequences of legalization of what's currently illegal. And before you ask, I can't give you a good answer on it. Hell, I'd be for legalization just to see if it works at this point.
But do you really want the federal government dicking around even more in the economy by regulating yet another product?![]()
D.C. Police Chief Cathy Lanier has instructed her force not to arrest anyone legally able to carry a firearm. Many have said that the D.C. political establishment would ignore yesterdays ruling in the Palmer v. DC case. At least for now. This shows that Chief Lanier is, at minimum, unwilling to be found in contempt.
Good cop news for a change:
BREAKING: DC Police Chief Recognizes Right to Carry, Reciprocity | The Truth About Guns
To be honest here I've seen more news stories lately reporting the good deeds of LEO. Your right that it's not as newsworthy as the bad stuff which gets "all" the headlines.