To Protect and to Serve II

Hindsight is 20-20 and yours is better than that based on the "facts" that you have gotten from the news. There is risk in the job. Those officers know the risks. The press is screaming about the drug epidemic. Those drugs are already illegal. So how do you propose to deal with it? Pass more laws with no enofrcement, or better yet, make them legal. That will solve all the drug problems, now won't it?
Making them illegal solves all drug problems also, I suppose?
 
So's the war on poverty.

You going to give up?

So where are the other drug search warrants served where officer's have been killed, if "the shoddy practices" are so common?
This country doesn't have a good track record in most wars in my lifetime. At best, just Pyrrhic victories.
 
Last edited:
I doubt your first bet but whatever. Go ahead and link that information and then I'll believe it. The deaths by drug OD is gaining on the HD numbers and it is impacting a younger demographic.

Was my "original justification societal cost"? I don't recall that but either or both are appropriate since no man is an island.

Oh, there is a societal cost. The family and friends of the younger person saddled with addiction, the theft and other criminal behavior to obtain the drug by the "victim" as well as their suppliers, the cost in intervention, emergency responses, medical care, etc., etc., etc. Now you may argue that it is the same for heart disease but you know that is a specious and basically fallacious argument but I get your main point, which is, where do you choose to draw the line?

Here's a simple way to look at it: Addicting drugs really, really bad; unhealthy diet is just bad. It takes a whole lot longer to get to the end game. And with the drug addiction it's a whole lot easier to blame someone or something else for the problem instead of the "victim's" own behavior. So society looks for someone else, like government, to solve the problem.

Ban alcohol..?
 
I've often wondered why in cases like this they don't just survail the people and take them into custody away from the where the warrant is to be served, then serve the warrant.

Waco, David Koresh...

Deep down, I think we have cops that want to live out their childhood cops and robbers fantasies. There is no adrenalin rush in just throwing cuffs on a guy while they are about to order a latte. No, we need to have some shootin' and car chasin'
 
Waco, David Koresh...

Deep down, I think we have cops that want to live out their childhood cops and robbers fantasies. There is no adrenalin rush in just throwing cuffs on a guy while they are about to order a latte. No, we need to have some shootin' and car chasin'
The copsI know are just the opposite. Don't want any violence. They just want to go home to their loved ones at night. I'm sure there are some that get their jollies going all commando.
 
This is terrible police work

"This disastrous search supposedly was the culmination of a two-week investigation triggered by a neighbor's tip. During that time police apparently did not manage to document suspicious activity at the house or even identify the owners, who had lived there for two decades."
 
This is terrible police work

"This disastrous search supposedly was the culmination of a two-week investigation triggered by a neighbor's tip. During that time police apparently did not manage to document suspicious activity at the house or even identify the owners, who had lived there for two decades."
BS, read the warrant. They did a controlled buy.
 
To be fair: i nearly always back the coos in this thread, respect GW and other cops who post here...but no knock raids are BS...and lazy police work. Like Huff said, these guys have to go get groceries etc...and honestly everyone i knew selling dope growing up spent money like they won the lottery...so catching them out in public would have been easy. Too many innocent people get hurt and killed now...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens
BS, read the warrant. They did a controlled buy.

The police witnessed none of it and they got bad intel. No black tar heroin and no 9mm pistol. The CI was lying or the cops are lying about the CI.
 
The police witnessed none of it and they got bad intel. No black tar heroin and no 9mm pistol. The CI was lying or the cops are lying about the CI.
It getting rough for old 37 in here. Can't we just appreciate the job they did in offing these people who were obviously a drain on society? I mean, they had a bag of weed in their home!
 
Well if we're going to sale it at pop up 7 11s at every corner how manys going to try it because it's now legal?

Then when those people lose their job and need money for more whose house they coming in?
You can’t honestly think there is massive pent up demand for people to shoot heroin, they’re just afraid of being busted. If you made all drugs legal I think you would see a decent increase in pot(if employers change their testing) and a very slight increase in harder stuff. The people who want to do coke are doing it. The people who want heroin are getting it. If you’re concerned about the societal costs, dismantling the criminal justice system that has grown up around this “war” will provide billions for PSA’s and treatment. And imagine the billions spent on indigent care for bangers shooting other bangers over drug turf and rip jobs.

I want to make clear that I have no personal interest in legalization other than the economic and societal ramifications. I’ve never taken anything not prescribed to me and wouldn’t if it were legal. But this war on drugs is such an asinine waste of money that could be doing a lot of good somewhere else in our country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
Or just felony stop the guy on his way to the gas station. Why run up in a home where you think they’re armed?
What if ones out and ones at home and when the guy out and about doesn't check in the peraon at the house starts flushing everything.

I understand you, but I see both sides.
 
Or just felony stop the guy on his way to the gas station. Why run up in a home where you think they’re armed?

Tactically this makes so much sense there has to be a reason. Are they worried that not being caught "on site with the goods" jeopardizes prosecution?
 
I would just like to see some consistency from the prohibitionist side. They are all about their drug of choice, everything else is bad though. Terrible hypocrisy. How many more have to die in this pointless drug war until they start to question their Lord and savior, the government, and its ability to determine what you should and should not be allowed to put in your own body?
 
Advertisement





Back
Top