volfannbama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 16,406
- Likes
- 20,215
I honestly think there's a legal issue in that scenario. If lethal force (and shooting someone anywhere is considered lethal force) is used you have to be able to justify said use. If you say you were only shooting to "wound" then how do you justify you were necessarily in imminent fear of severe bodily harm or death? (and BTW people have and will again die from GSW's to the leg)
Maybe LG can comment but I think there could be severe legal penalties regarding justification for use of lethal force with "intent to wound".
The only time a firearm should be used is when deadly force is authorized.