Exactly! Brought this up earlier. There is nothing in the video that proves this man was shot...
More reality(fake) tv...
		
		
	 
I'm not saying that it did not happen exactly as the man said it did.
What I AM saying is that the video I see shows only that he had his hands up at SOME POINT, but we don't know when relative to his being struck.  And we don't know exactly what was going on at the time of the shot being fired.
Again, I'm not saying it did not happen as he describes, I'm just saying the video adds almost nothing to it.  My concern is the jumping to conclusions some seem to want to do here, and trying to continue an already questionable narrative by adding this incident to other, partially filmed incidents, to support that narrative.
I would like to know who took the video, and why we have video of the man with his hands up AT SOME point, then video of the scene apparently well after the shooting, but nothing in between.
An obvious possibility is that the person who took the video stopped, thinking everything would be okay, then started again after the shot.  Another possibility is that the person who recorded it recorded everything, but then provided only the parts they wanted to.  A third possibility is that the attorney for the man released just the parts they wanted to.
Knowing what I know about such incidents is that, if FDLE is doing the investigation, then they will examine forensically the device on which it was recorded (i.e. cell phone).  If there is indeed more, or was and they can recover it, that is going to raise some interesting questions.
Now, totally on a side note, I of course also wonder if an officer, unable to see exactly what was in his hand, fired at the kid with autism, and accidentally hit the man.  That is also possible.