To Protect and to Serve II

And there is yet another laughable post you try to make. "Duty bound" that pops up whenever you don't have an argument to what I post.

You really are sad and pathetic.

He is so "hell bent" on this issue, there must be personal experience in his background.......
 
And there is yet another laughable post you try to make. "Duty bound" that pops up whenever you don't have an argument to what I post.

You really are sad and pathetic.

You are the one that said "duty bound" when we suggested that cops not enforce all of the laws that the lawmakers create. Then, after we posted time after time different events where cops gave other cops breaks, now it is a case of me using "duty bound" when I don't allegedly have a strong counterpoint.

Those are your words... don't back away from them now.
 
Well then settle it here and now, what are your thoughts on the death of Eric Garner? Should the officers involved faced charges?

Are you for real? Have we not discussed this enough in the past that you cannot and will not accept what I said plenty of times before?

I've said before, and I'll say it one last freakin time just for you since you have such a short memory you think I'm going to automatically take the side of the cops. The case deserved to go to trial.

Repeating, the case should have gone to trial. Clear enough? Because I've said the same damn thing to you in the past when you asked in the past. You think I'm going to change my answer?
 
You are the one that said "duty bound" when we suggested that cops not enforce all of the laws that the lawmakers create. Then, after we posted time after time different events where cops gave other cops breaks, now it is a case of me using "duty bound" when I don't allegedly have a strong counterpoint.

Those are your words... don't back away from them now.

Show me where I used those words without mocking you.

Go find the posts. Don't back away from what should be low hanging fruit and proving me wrong. Don't use the excuse "Everyone's seen it before." Don't make the excuse of not being able to search it. Because if you don't prove it at this point, you really and truly are sad and pathetic.

Show the whole forum where I used those words.
 
Are you for real? Have we not discussed this enough in the past that you cannot and will not accept what I said plenty of times before?

I've said before, and I'll say it one last freakin time just for you since you have such a short memory you think I'm going to automatically take the side of the cops. The case deserved to go to trial.

Repeating, the case should have gone to trial. Clear enough? Because I've said the same damn thing to you in the past when you asked in the past. You think I'm going to change my answer?

No, I'm just trying to clear the air here. I remember clearly giving you credit for your stance on the death of Eric Garner. I was trying to give you a chance to reiterate your stance. Don't get so defensive, it'll be ok.
 
He is so "hell bent" on this issue, there must be personal experience in his background.......

No, he's just pathetic. I'll give DTH credit for actually bringing something new to the table every once in a while and having a somewhat reasonable discussion from time to time. And even being objective once in a blue moon.

But Ras? hat a sad and pathetic existence he leads. Same three things over and over and over with zero substance to them. He's like the Donald Trump of the cop thread.
 
You don't see the majority of people in here complaining about murders. We're mostly complaining about people that make rolling stops, people with busted tail lights, sellers of loose cigarettes, small time drug dealers and users, and people that talk back to the cops when they do dumb s**t.

No one in here is losing sleep about bloody murderers. You sound ridiculous.

Ridiculous?

Me? Have you taken the time to actually read the **** you post on here? I like you Ras. But your mind is so twisted it's scary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
No, I'm just trying to clear the air here. I remember clearly giving you credit for your stance on the death of Eric Garner. I was trying to give you a chance to reiterate your stance. Don't get so defensive, it'll be ok.

Chance to clear the air? Why even bring it up if you knew in advance what my answer was going to be?

Instead of "clearing the air" perhaps you should have said "yeah, I've seen you be objective in this situations before and I give you credit for actually seeing things from both sides."

Don't want me to be defensive? Don't ask offensive questions you already know the answer to in advance.
 
Chance to clear the air? Why even bring it up if you knew in advance what my answer was going to be?

Instead of "clearing the air" perhaps you should have said "yeah, I've seen you be objective in this situations before and I give you credit for actually seeing things from both sides."

Don't want me to be defensive? Don't ask offensive questions you already know the answer to in advance.


I didn't know if Ras had actually seen your stance on EG's death. Take a pill.
 
Are you for real? Have we not discussed this enough in the past that you cannot and will not accept what I said plenty of times before?

I've said before, and I'll say it one last freakin time just for you since you have such a short memory you think I'm going to automatically take the side of the cops. The case deserved to go to trial.

Repeating, the case should have gone to trial. Clear enough? Because I've said the same damn thing to you in the past when you asked in the past. You think I'm going to change my answer?
And with that said, why is such a problem when I highlight this case along with the case of the man in Charleston for getting shot in the back for having a busted tail light or for people getting shot/killed/injured by cops on traffic stops for the most trivial of infractions? All of those trivial infractions (including the selling of loose cigarettes) has a lost civilian life/injured civilian and a cop with blood on his hands in each of those incidents.
 
It wouldn't matter. Because he comes up with the same nonsense each and every time of something I've never said.

Oh, and the same issue you may have with me pointing out loose cigarettes is the magnified times 100 by seeing these clowns say that Eric Garner died from being overweight.

I'm telling the truth by saying he died as a result of cops choking him to death over loose cigarettes. The others are lying when they say the cause of death was him being obese... not the cop pulling his entire weight down on his throat as re screams his last words, "I can't breathe".
 
I think you should consult with Wolfe on this. They didn't crush his throat..... It was the other physical factors that killed him.....

You don't have to crush a man's throat to suffocate him. Are we really having this basic 3rd grade level biology lesson right now?

Had the cops not choked him, he would still be alive right now. How hard is that for any of you to understand?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
And with that said, why is such a problem when I highlight this case along with the case of the man in Charleston for getting shot in the back for having a busted tail light or for people getting shot/killed/injured by cops on traffic stops for the most trivial of infractions? All of those trivial infractions (including the selling of loose cigarettes) has a lost civilian life/injured civilian and a cop with blood on his hands in each of those incidents.

Has the case in Charleston gone to trial yet?

You don't even know because you would rather be outraged than actually keep up with the case. Keep spouting off the same thing over and over and over again and making others chuckle any time they see your posts.
 
Oh, and the same issue you may have with me pointing out loose cigarettes is the magnified times 100 by seeing these clowns say that Eric Garner died from being overweight.

I'm telling the truth by saying he died as a result of cops choking him to death over loose cigarettes. The others are lying when they say the cause of death was him being obese... not the cop pulling his entire weight down on his throat as re screams his last words, "I can't breathe".

You're a broken record. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I didn't know if Ras had actually seen your stance on EG's death. Take a pill.

And it wouldn't matter since he brings the same thing up over and over and over again. Right now there are two active threads with him saying the same thing and bringing it up. And there have been far more in the past when he falls back onto the loose cigarettes, broken taillights and whatnot.

It truly is sad.
 
Has the case in Charleston gone to trial yet?

Not that I know of. But the thing that irritates me the most about that fiasco is that had there not been video of the shooting, the general public and cops would have easily dismissed this as some goon roughing up a cop and the cop had to fight for dear life to stop this violent scourge on the community (busted tail light, back child support) from endangering others.

You don't even know because you would rather be outraged than actually keep up with the case. Keep spouting off the same thing over and over and over again and making others chuckle any time they see your posts.

Wait, I see now. In your mind, you think that saying I repeat the same thing over and over again is an insult. I don't take it that way, I guess. I see it as being consistent and staying on message. Every time these cops engage in this sort of buffoonery that results in the loss of life of a civilian over the most trivial of offenses, I will continue to stay on message and remind you again, and again, and again, about the trivial deaths that you seem to want to put in the past.

Shooting_of_Walter_Scott.jpeg
 
Not that I know of. But the thing that irritates me the most about that fiasco is that had there not been video of the shooting, the general public and cops would have easily dismissed this as some goon roughing up a cop and the cop had to fight for dear life to stop this violent scourge on the community (busted tail light, back child support) from endangering others.

See, there's your problem. You whine and complain and don't even follow things through. In case you didn't know, the trial is scheduled for November and the only reason it's that far out is because the DA is trying to juggle the Dylan Roof trial with this one.


Wait, I see now. In your mind, you think that saying I repeat the same thing over and over again is an insult. I don't take it that way, I guess. I see it as being consistent and staying on message. Every time these cops engage in this sort of buffoonery that results in the loss of life of a civilian over the most trivial of offenses, I will continue to stay on message and remind you again, and again, and again, about the trivial deaths that you seem to want to put in the past.

You call it consistent. The rest of us call it "lack of any new material." It's not insulting. It truly is sad.
 
And it wouldn't matter since he brings the same thing up over and over and over again. Right now there are two active threads with him saying the same thing and bringing it up. And there have been far more in the past when he falls back onto the loose cigarettes, broken taillights and whatnot.

It truly is sad.

I'm staying on message until I make you people see and understand the pettiness of the laws that cops choose to enforce with deadly force. Until I see a change in cops behavior, then I will continue to highlight these most egregious of cases by cops.
 
Last edited:
I'm staying on message until I make you people see and understand the pettiness of the laws that cops choose to enforce with deadly force. Until I see a change in cops behavior, then I will continue to highlight these most egregious of cases be cops.

Stay on message with the lack of a message.

Got it. Keep fighting the good fight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I'm staying on message until I make you people see and understand the pettiness of the laws that cops choose to enforce with deadly force. Until I see a change in cops behavior, then I will continue to highlight these most egregious of cases be cops.

"Fight the Power!!!!"
 
I'm staying on message until I make you people see and understand the pettiness of the laws that cops choose to enforce with deadly force. Until I see a change in cops behavior, then I will continue to highlight these most egregious of cases be cops.

You're gonna be waiting a long time Ras. Police are the bloody tip of the spear that is politics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement





Back
Top