DEFENDTHISHOUSE
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2006
- Messages
- 29,145
- Likes
- 32,926
And there is yet another laughable post you try to make. "Duty bound" that pops up whenever you don't have an argument to what I post.
You really are sad and pathetic.
Well then settle it here and now, what are your thoughts on the death of Eric Garner? Should the officers involved faced charges?
You are the one that said "duty bound" when we suggested that cops not enforce all of the laws that the lawmakers create. Then, after we posted time after time different events where cops gave other cops breaks, now it is a case of me using "duty bound" when I don't allegedly have a strong counterpoint.
Those are your words... don't back away from them now.
Are you for real? Have we not discussed this enough in the past that you cannot and will not accept what I said plenty of times before?
I've said before, and I'll say it one last freakin time just for you since you have such a short memory you think I'm going to automatically take the side of the cops. The case deserved to go to trial.
Repeating, the case should have gone to trial. Clear enough? Because I've said the same damn thing to you in the past when you asked in the past. You think I'm going to change my answer?
He is so "hell bent" on this issue, there must be personal experience in his background.......
You don't see the majority of people in here complaining about murders. We're mostly complaining about people that make rolling stops, people with busted tail lights, sellers of loose cigarettes, small time drug dealers and users, and people that talk back to the cops when they do dumb s**t.
No one in here is losing sleep about bloody murderers. You sound ridiculous.
No, I'm just trying to clear the air here. I remember clearly giving you credit for your stance on the death of Eric Garner. I was trying to give you a chance to reiterate your stance. Don't get so defensive, it'll be ok.
Chance to clear the air? Why even bring it up if you knew in advance what my answer was going to be?
Instead of "clearing the air" perhaps you should have said "yeah, I've seen you be objective in this situations before and I give you credit for actually seeing things from both sides."
Don't want me to be defensive? Don't ask offensive questions you already know the answer to in advance.
And with that said, why is such a problem when I highlight this case along with the case of the man in Charleston for getting shot in the back for having a busted tail light or for people getting shot/killed/injured by cops on traffic stops for the most trivial of infractions? All of those trivial infractions (including the selling of loose cigarettes) has a lost civilian life/injured civilian and a cop with blood on his hands in each of those incidents.Are you for real? Have we not discussed this enough in the past that you cannot and will not accept what I said plenty of times before?
I've said before, and I'll say it one last freakin time just for you since you have such a short memory you think I'm going to automatically take the side of the cops. The case deserved to go to trial.
Repeating, the case should have gone to trial. Clear enough? Because I've said the same damn thing to you in the past when you asked in the past. You think I'm going to change my answer?
It wouldn't matter. Because he comes up with the same nonsense each and every time of something I've never said.
I think you should consult with Wolfe on this. They didn't crush his throat..... It was the other physical factors that killed him.....
And with that said, why is such a problem when I highlight this case along with the case of the man in Charleston for getting shot in the back for having a busted tail light or for people getting shot/killed/injured by cops on traffic stops for the most trivial of infractions? All of those trivial infractions (including the selling of loose cigarettes) has a lost civilian life/injured civilian and a cop with blood on his hands in each of those incidents.
Oh, and the same issue you may have with me pointing out loose cigarettes is the magnified times 100 by seeing these clowns say that Eric Garner died from being overweight.
I'm telling the truth by saying he died as a result of cops choking him to death over loose cigarettes. The others are lying when they say the cause of death was him being obese... not the cop pulling his entire weight down on his throat as re screams his last words, "I can't breathe".
I didn't know if Ras had actually seen your stance on EG's death. Take a pill.
Has the case in Charleston gone to trial yet?
You don't even know because you would rather be outraged than actually keep up with the case. Keep spouting off the same thing over and over and over again and making others chuckle any time they see your posts.
Not that I know of. But the thing that irritates me the most about that fiasco is that had there not been video of the shooting, the general public and cops would have easily dismissed this as some goon roughing up a cop and the cop had to fight for dear life to stop this violent scourge on the community (busted tail light, back child support) from endangering others.
Wait, I see now. In your mind, you think that saying I repeat the same thing over and over again is an insult. I don't take it that way, I guess. I see it as being consistent and staying on message. Every time these cops engage in this sort of buffoonery that results in the loss of life of a civilian over the most trivial of offenses, I will continue to stay on message and remind you again, and again, and again, about the trivial deaths that you seem to want to put in the past.
And it wouldn't matter since he brings the same thing up over and over and over again. Right now there are two active threads with him saying the same thing and bringing it up. And there have been far more in the past when he falls back onto the loose cigarettes, broken taillights and whatnot.
It truly is sad.
I'm staying on message until I make you people see and understand the pettiness of the laws that cops choose to enforce with deadly force. Until I see a change in cops behavior, then I will continue to highlight these most egregious of cases be cops.
I'm staying on message until I make you people see and understand the pettiness of the laws that cops choose to enforce with deadly force. Until I see a change in cops behavior, then I will continue to highlight these most egregious of cases be cops.
