To Protect and to Serve II

And here I thought luther and OBV were making the most moronic comments as of late. You just came in with a "hold my beer..." post that easily tops them off.

Best part of the article:



Because the Po-Po just randomly select people in the parking lot of Outback to shoot before praying and having dinner.

Also what was the unarmed manager going to do if someone had a gun? You can’t shoot us, it’s agaisnt the rules!
 
Instead, you're a poor sensitive snowflake.

You seek to be the one upset. I simply don’t like being in the presence of terrorist. Perhaps if they actually served and protected instead of harasssing and extorting, everyone would feel different about them.

But continue blaming the citizens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You seek to be the one upset. I simply don’t like being in the presence of terrorist. Perhaps if they actually served and protected instead of harasssing and extorting, everyone would feel different about them.

But continue blaming the citizens.

Awww, poor little guy. If I knew where you were, I'd give you a hug and a pat on the head to let you know everything will be okay.

Let's just face facts here. The original article about what happened with the diners was petty and childish. Your response was petty and childish. You calling all cops "terrorists" is petty and childish. You claiming "everyone" would feel differently is petty, childish and in no way accurate.

But continue blaming the cops for your sensitive streak a mile wide.
 

I have mixed opinions about this.

1. If you can't open carry in The South, where can you open carry? Makes no difference to me whether they are law enforcement or civilians. We still have far too many snowflakes that are scared of guns.

2. Yet, having said that, there is this thing about private property. If someone doesn't want you smoking in their restaurant, we are expected to comply. Unfortunately, the same should be true here, Like it or not.
 
The cops weren't attacking anything lol

Look, I'd almost be willing to bet pennies to dollars those cops would actually have preferred to let the dad go to finish what he started. Because unlike your thinking, they are people too with families and some probably have daughters as well. But that courtroom didn't exactly represent the best venue to allow such things. Especially not on TV either.

Let this one go, it's not worth the time you are going to take to argue.

I'm not arguing anything. I'm just highlighting and contrasting how criminals are handled and how victims and law abiding citizens are handled.

And I don't think you truly understand the idea of justice. Or the distinction between what is just and what is unjust. This is basically the theme of most of these posts in this cop thread. It merely comes down to were the actions of the cops just or unjust in each circumstance, not legal or illegal.
 
I'm not arguing anything. I'm just highlighting and contrasting how criminals are handled and how victims and law abiding citizens are handled.

And I don't think you truly understand the idea of justice. Or the distinction between what is just and what is unjust. This is basically the theme of most of these posts in this cop thread. It merely comes down to were the actions of the cops just or unjust in each circumstance, not legal or illegal.

I don't think there is any justice in the world fitting for what that monster did. Even daily cheese grater attacks on his genitalia followed by an alcohol bath isn't good enough.

Again, I'd be willing to bet in a "just" world the deputies in that courtroom would have just stepped back and had silly grins on their faces as Dad tore that monster to shreds. But, unfortunately, they had to stop him.

Street or legal justice, nothing will ever fix that warped and evil mind. No pain or suffering will help those victims of his perverted attacks. The only thing we as citizens can ever hope for is for him to be put in general population in prison and let nature take it's course.
 
Awww, poor little guy. If I knew where you were, I'd give you a hug and a pat on the head to let you know everything will be okay.

Let's just face facts here. The original article about what happened with the diners was petty and childish. Your response was petty and childish. You calling all cops "terrorists" is petty and childish. You claiming "everyone" would feel differently is petty, childish and in no way accurate.

But continue blaming the cops for your sensitive streak a mile wide.

Continue living in denial and blaming the citizens. If cops served and protected instead of harassing and extorting everyone would like them. Instead your unions fight to limit the rights of the people to protect your job
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
A little humor into this thread.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/dumbdrunkpeople/status/957996584108789761[/twitter]
 
We now return to our regularly scheduled stereotyping and judgement of a profession by its worst examples...
Well it is our resident Russian wannabe. Ironic that he wants so much to be Russian yet has no clue what cops and law enforcement there are remotely like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I'm still trying to figure out why we only have to post negative things in this thread.

Maybe because that's all there is?

I'd love to post how my local cops came by and mowed my grass today instead of writing a ticket, but I can't.
 
I'm still trying to figure out why we only have to post negative things in this thread.

Probably because your unions have created the world’s largest prison population. Combine that with police brutality and use of lethal force so bad that the UN human rights council has chime in on it, and it shouldn’t be that hard to figure out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Probably because your unions have created the world’s largest prison population. Combine that with police brutality and use of lethal force so bad that the UN human rights council has chime in on it, and it shouldn’t be that hard to figure out.

I'd like to take note of the first time you've invoked anything about the UN as support for your views.

Only when it fits your slanted agenda, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I'd like to take note of the first time you've invoked anything about the UN as support for your views.

Only when it fits your slanted agenda, right?

Does the UN have issues? Sure. Do I support it? No. But the point still stands that the issue of police brutality in this nation is bad it has gained international intention. Meanwhile you and others in this thread live in denial.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
I have mixed opinions about this.

1. If you can't open carry in The South, where can you open carry? Makes no difference to me whether they are law enforcement or civilians. We still have far too many snowflakes that are scared of guns.

2. Yet, having said that, there is this thing about private property. If someone doesn't want you smoking in their restaurant, we are expected to comply. Unfortunately, the same should be true here, Like it or not.

Outback’s policy is to allow LEO to go armed in their stores. The manager apparently didn’t know the rules and told the officer to leave. They had the manger call and apologize.
 
I found it to be funny.

Sad that others have to see the worst thing possible instead of having a laugh.

It was funny.

This thread is full of some of the strangest posters this site has to offer, and they're all smarter than you and me.

Just ask them.
 
Probably because your unions have created the world’s largest prison population. Combine that with police brutality and use of lethal force so bad that the UN human rights council has chime in on it, and it shouldn’t be that hard to figure out.

That is the irritating thing when it comes to cops on this issue. They fall back on the defense of "just following orders"/"enforcing the law", yet they don't use the power of their union to influence changes in the laws or in developing better training.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement

Back
Top