allvolrecruiting
shaynep_media
- Joined
- May 10, 2021
- Messages
- 7,344
- Likes
- 37,269
BGA is going to be really nice soon. I mean they already are but they’re all young outside of two other D1 DBs who are older plus QB.I saw him vs BGA. …..not “loaded” with5* talent, but 5-10 solid 3* or 4* players down the road…..and he really impressed me with his arm and athleticism.
A blithering idiot, like me, could look and say, “Oh. He’s really good.” He definitely stands out.
Faizon Brandon is a combination of Joe Milton and Hendon Hooker- and has a spiral like Chris Leak.Did we even recruit this kid? Would have thought we would have being he is a home state kid.
Agreed. I like Faizon a little better personally (overall physically more gifted and a little more potential) but both are very good. If they were in two different classes, Heupel likely goes all in on Curtis.Faizon Brandon is a combination of Joe Milton and Hendon Hooker- and has a spiral like Chris Leak.
6’4” 220 4.5 speed and can make any throw and sees the field well.
Once Heupel gets his guy that’s it. For every class it’s been that way.
Curtis is a damn good QB, but Heupel only takes one guy each class. Georgia got a good one. So did we.
They almost were. He came very close to reclassifying. And boy would that have been interesting.Agreed. I like Faizon a little better personally (overall physically more gifted and a little more potential) but both are very good. If they were in two different classes, Heupel likely goes all in on Curtis.
That's the word the guy I was responding to used. I assumed what he meant was that the staff envisioned (projected) that Faizon would develop into a better player than Curtis and responded on that basis.what does this even mean? I am not saying you are wrong, I just don't remember that word ever being used.
I thought it was more a system fit thing.
Respectfully no one outside of Texas truly knows how good Arch is. He hasn't run the offense in meaningful games yet for Texas.That's the word the guy I was responding to used. I assumed what he meant was that the staff envisioned (projected) that Faizon would develop into a better player than Curtis and responded on that basis.
And I do remember people saying the staff thought Nico was better than Arch, which is always the case (and not just with our fanbase), somebody will always say that in such a situation, whether it's true or not.
He’s still better than Arch.Kind of like the staff liked the projectability of Nico better than Arch? Hopefully, the staff is right this time.
Faizon plays much harder competition as well.Agreed. I like Faizon a little better personally (overall physically more gifted and a little more potential) but both are very good. If they were in two different classes, Heupel likely goes all in on Curtis.