Crazy Ivan
Carpe Jugulum
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Messages
- 8,558
- Likes
- 16,860
Get paid after you sign, not before. If you wonder if they exist, look and see where Zykevious Walker commits today...the CB is wrong, he’s going to AU.What's to stop a player from taking the bag of money and then go elsewhere? I mean, there's literally nothing Auburn could do about it. One reason amongst many that the bagman theory makes no sense.
What guarantees you get paid then? How does a recruit know whether they'll get paid their unlawful payment? The whole thing sounds tenuous. Plus if Auburn is paying, so are we. So is Bama. So is Clemson. I doubt Auburn has cornered the market on corruption.Get paid after you sign, not before. If you wonder if they exist, look and see where Zykevious Walker commits today...the CB is wrong, he’s going to AU.
If they don’t, that would hurt future recruits they offered any incentives to. Regardless what they offered a recruit, recruits wouldn’t trust them. Again, not every recruit gets paid, MOST don’t. No one is saying UT (or any SEC school) doesn’t participate. The question is, why didn’t you match the offer on the ones who are paid. Sometimes it’s they like others better and want to use those same resources elsewhere, it’s not unlimited funds, for any school. Only AV knows why he (they) didn’t match AU.What guarantees you get paid then? How does a recruit know whether they'll get paid their unlawful payment? The whole thing sounds tenuous. Plus if Auburn is paying, so are we. So is Bama. So is Clemson. I doubt Auburn has cornered the market on corruption.
Oh, and btw, no AU hasn’t cornered the market on corruption but it wasn’t for lack of trying on their part...What guarantees you get paid then? How does a recruit know whether they'll get paid their unlawful payment? The whole thing sounds tenuous. Plus if Auburn is paying, so are we. So is Bama. So is Clemson. I doubt Auburn has cornered the market on corruption.
If they don’t, that would hurt future recruits they offered any incentives to. Regardless what they offered a recruit, recruits wouldn’t trust them. Again, not every recruit gets paid, MOST don’t. No one is saying UT (or any SEC school) doesn’t participate. The question is, why didn’t you match the offer on the ones who are paid. Sometimes it’s they like others better and want to use those same resources elsewhere, it’s not unlimited funds, for any school. Only AV knows why he (they) didn’t match AU.
What guarantees you get paid then? How does a recruit know whether they'll get paid their unlawful payment? The whole thing sounds tenuous. Plus if Auburn is paying, so are we. So is Bama. So is Clemson. I doubt Auburn has cornered the market on corruption.
That’s not my understanding but doesn’t change he went to highest bid.
Correct on all fronts. We defended the attack.
Wow been quite the day i didn’t even watch the announcement as it was a forgone conclusion to everyone on UT side that he was a vol. Everyone got sideswiped here and from all the info that I have gotten it appears the father is the one who has made this decision and without involving others who were involved previously. Every single person that was involved from his side as of late yesterday said vol. no need to go into specifics but I believe something happened very late or early this am and we were not given a fair shake if that makes sense. Now all that being said....In my heart I think this one gets flipped once all the dust settles....