crusse10
THIS MAN IS A PERVERT
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
- Messages
- 21,348
- Likes
- 2,818
I am not the poster you are responding to, but here's my opinion: I do not believe Alexis Johnson will be reinstated until after his charges get completely dropped in October, if he stays out of trouble. By then, the season is halfway over. He will be redshirted and then will play ball next season. Again, JMO.
if the entire room of reporters asks no questions about it, they're not doing their job
Q. When did settlement negotiations begin?
A: They have been discussed off and on since before Smith actually filed the lawsuit February 24, 2016. The current negotiations began in earnest in April.
I am not the poster you are responding to, but here's my opinion: I do not believe Alexis Johnson will be reinstated until after his charges get completely dropped in October, if he stays out of trouble. By then, the season is halfway over. He will be redshirted and then will play ball next season. Again, JMO.
Can't agree with that. If there was nothing there no way you pay 2mil
I don't disagree, but what kind of question is there to be asked? Based on what we know, it doesn't appear Jones had any say in the matter (settlement).
Also, I didn't know at the time of my previous post that the settlement occurred two days prior to UT lawyers having to report to court again.
The BOT wanted this thing settled and as LWS has stated the two sides had been negotiating before the lawsuit had even been filed.
Parties offer some answers to UT gender discrimination settlement | WBIR.com
Do you believe that the Title IX case has impacted your recruiting?
How has the team responded to the Title IX case?
Do you expect a fallout on campus during the season in response to the Title IX case?
Have you stepped up measures for the team in response to the Title IX case?
Do you believe that the Title IX case has impacted your recruiting?
How has the team responded to the Title IX case?
Do you expect a fallout on campus during the season in response to the Title IX case?
Have you stepped up measures for the team in response to the Title IX case?
if the entire room of reporters asks no questions about it, they're not doing their job
At media days, they would be wasting their time. Once such a case is settled, coaches and players will merely refer all questions on that topic to their legal counsel. Once you settle the suit, there is nothing more to say publicly or on the record.
So, if those reporters have half an ounce of common sense, they won't do their job based on your opinion.
In the settlement UT admitted no wrongdoing, no illegal activity, and no negligence. The plaintiffs agreed to UT not guilty position. So what the hell would the NCAA have issues with? Are they going to investigate a case that is totally out of their jurisdiction and try to impose penalties over something that has been resolved in a settlement?But, can't they still step in & give us sanctions and/or NCAA violations over this even though this particular matter might not have been an NCAA issue?
In the settlement UT admitted no wrongdoing, no illegal activity, and no negligence. The plaintiffs agreed to UT not guilty position. So what the hell would the NCAA have issues with? Are they going to investigate a case that is totally out of their jurisdiction and try to impose penalties over something that has been resolved in a settlement?
It's no longer a legal issue either. This is the best case scenario for UT, end the bad PR, go on record as not guilty and having done no wrong. Take this wake-up call to educate UT student-athletes and boost up the monitoring processes when issues like this occur. Now put this noise behind you and on with freaking FOOTBALL.I don't think people fully understand just how NOT an NCAA issue this is
I read all this and all I hear the lawyer say is "Cha Ching!"And here also is what the attorney who filed the Complaint has said about the experience (as from the ESPN article) -- of course, one is right to consider why he didn't simply make this statement last week or sooner // prior to the settlement payment, but anyway, it's pretty clear the university culture is good, just like the head coaches + the 3 players said on camera earlier:
"My clients and I are dismissing the lawsuit with prejudice and signed the settlement agreement," Smith said in a statement. "We are satisfied that, while universities everywhere struggle with these issues, the University of Tennessee has made significant progress in the way they educate and respond to sexual assault cases. My clients and I are also convinced that the University's leadership is truly committed to continue its exemplary efforts to create a model as it relates to sexual misconduct.
"If we all can look ahead and imagine our state's flagship university as a leader in awareness, education, support and aggressive response to these issues, this lawsuit and the resulting outcome would have contributed in a small way to the safety, well-being and hopeful futures of many young people who from time to time call the University of Tennessee home."
There was no way they would reinstate him with this lawsuit hanging over their heads. He at least now has a chance. Maybe you are right; care to explain.
I have a daughter and honestly, I suggest you stop right there.
The most realistic cases with Williams and Johnson are being prosecuted criminally which is what I would be after, as a father. Don't you ever say something like that to me again.
You wouldn't have to worry about when to settle, because a financial lawsuit would be the last attempt I would think of.
Unfortunately, with people like you, financial gain instead of criminal justice is much more common than it should be in life today.
OJ was tried criminally first.
That is a huge difference.
Their lawsuit was a last-ditch effort to make OJ pay.
The majority of these girls went straight to financial lawsuit and it's against UT not the people they said are responsible.
Surely you see how that's not getting justice against those they are accusing?
If none of this has any bearing on your opinion, we'll call it an impasse. The example you gave, is a good reason lawsuits should exist. Unfortunately, it is the polar opposite of what is happening here.
Handing over somewhere between 100,000 and 200,000 to each plantiff for UT is like me handing someone $10 or $20 to go away.
Assuming the attorney's portion and other fees are as mentioned in this thread.
It is remarkable to me that the plantiff side has agreed to such low figures. If any side is to "blame" for the settlement, it's the party(ies) fault for accepting.
UT was clearly ready to keep pushing and possibly even trial. They knew the case was weak and probably not winnable. However, another year of legal fees and other factors, Tennessee is getting out extremely on the cheap side.
They won the bargaining side of this civil ordeal, which means they won.
The whole thing was about money at the end of the day. If you don't see that you are choosing to be dumb.
If it wasn't about money, you take this mother****er to trial. If you are the accuser. That is, unless your case can't hold water. Period!