What about the out throw with a defender in his chest. Your post and thread knocking this kid after everything he has been through at UT is childish and ignorant.
"After everything he has been through"? As our counselors and academic advisors told us in HS, only 1 in 10,000 of you will play in college and only 1 in 100K will play professionally.
Do you have any remote idea how privileged he actually is to have won the genetic lottery and had the opportunity to play for UT?
We are an institution like only a few other storied programs where walk-on players like Paul Bain work 2-jobs in the off-season to pay their way through school just for a chance to take the field.
There is absolutely no victim argument for JG.
Can he make the throws that need to be made? Yes. Does he throw into double and triple coverage? No. Does he need alot of development? Yes. Has he received it? No. BM looks l8ke he should not be on the field. What do you want me to say. JG is all we got right now.
No he cannot make the throws he needs to make.
Yes he throws into coverage.
Yes he still needs development.
Yes he has actually received more development than any QB on our active roster.
BM(and Shrout) looks like he needs more time on the field.
JG is not all we got.
Are you saying that the other two Freshman looked better than JG and that you want one of those kids to start against the DOGS? JG is all we got. You can thank your daddy Pruity for recruiting such great back up QBs
I'll say the team looked better with BM than JG and it's very reasonable to suggest BM' s play could easily surpass JG's soon.
I want one of them to start against the DOGS.
I'm sorry but JG is lost cost fallacy. Whether it's 100% JG's fault or not it is Pruitt & Chaney's responsibility to improve our QB play. By every measurable metric JG has regressed with improved play around him. Pruitt & Chaney would be remiss to the rest of the team to hinder their development by continuing to start a veteran with a limited ceiling.