"We" wouldn't be paying them. Athletes, like any other famous person, would be free to profit from their likeness and name AND YES be responsible for tax on their earnings.No.
Don't need to. We do not need to be paying college athletes. Period. If you want, you can give them a tax write off, but that's it. Or if you insist on this tack, share the revenue generated among all players of all sports that the university offers. It would be a good lesson in socialism/equality for them.
Because without the university, they have no 'fame'."We" wouldn't be paying them. Athletes, like any other famous person, would be free to profit from their likeness and name AND YES be responsible for tax on their earnings.
If the school is going to sell jerseys with their name on it, they get a cut....... just like America SHOULD function. What is radical about this? Why should someone's fame NOT be theirs? Why should someone else be able to profit from their picture but not them?
What is radical about this?
So, LeBron wouldn't be anything without the NBA and doesn't deserve to be able to sign contracts to sell his image and likeness?Oh puleeez. I had never heard of him before college basketball put him on the map. And you do realize that this will be:
![]()
They're going to get publicity via ESPN.I know that. My answer was a simple alternative.
Athletes should not be paid until they turn professional anyway. Schools need to stop using the athletes name, image, and likeness. See how the athletes like not getting Free publicity.
Seriously, you guys insist "we should recruit the best athletes, guys with the most talent" and then don't want to acknowledge that talent is valuable to them PERSONALLY as well as to the school.Then the student athletes need to get paid by ESPN and all the sports channels.![]()
Seriously, you guys insist "we should recruit the best athletes, guys with the most talent" and then don't want to acknowledge that talent is valuable to them PERSONALLY as well as to the school.
Why is it so hard to allow an American to profit from their own talent?
And they should also, like any other citizen, be able to profit if someone sells their image or name on merchandise.They ARE profiting.
Free everything...........and a great internship for their professional career.....
Perfect.....I go back to my original post. Let the student athletes make all they can..... and pay their own way.And they should also, like any other citizen, be able to profit if someone sells their image or name on merchandise.
Again, this isn't radical. Either stop trading on the athlete's fame and talent or share the proceeds from the sales. This is the American way. You don't get to sell someone's image and name and not cut them in on the profits.
Schools quit offering scholarships to players and the pros will step in with a farm system.Perfect.....I go back to my original post. Let the student athletes make all they can..... and pay their own way.
Sounds like that’s what you want anywaySchools quit offering scholarships to players and the pros will step in with a farm system.
Elite players hit the farm teams and ESPN signs the contract with them, not the NCAA.
College football becomes frat boy intermural level.
Shrug. That's free market economics at its best.