Strength of schedule is absolutely no concern of mine this year. Having a losing record last year and so many question marks coming from that season, I wouldn't mind every team we play being ranking in the triple digits.
In the SEC you cant afford to schedule too many big non-conference games considering your conference schedule unlike the Big Ten, ACC, Pac-10,Big East where over conference schedule is a lot weaker IMO
In the SEC you cant afford to schedule too many big non-conference games considering your conference schedule unlike the Big Ten, ACC, Pac-10,Big East where over conference schedule is a lot weaker IMO
For an SEC schedule, Alabama has one of the weakest I have seen. Toughest game will be at Ole Miss, who should be a good team, but still they struck the lottery with that SEC schedule. Good thing NS is really going after those marquee games!
SOS doesn't take in effect until after the season has ended. That's when you look back and say, "Oh, UCLA was actually really good this year." Or, "I'm surprised and glad Alabama sucked that bad."
Kind of like when we were #2 or #3 during preseason in 2005. Turns out we sucked. Yeah.
#118 in the FBS is still better than almost any FCS school. Some SEC teams routinely play two FCS schools. Not worried about SOS... worried about winning.
With a new staff, new systems on O and D, and some players who badly need confidence... I like opening with WKU.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.