The Problems with Trans-ideology

#8,779
#8,779
Vol since 77 said:
We live in some very troubling times when 211 elected people vote against something like this. Children being protected should absolutely be one thing nearly everyone should agree on.
Click to expand...
People will really believe that there are 211 elected officials that don't want to "protect children" rather than consider the groundbreaking notion that Benny Johnson on Twitter isn't giving you the accurate story
 
#8,780
#8,780
NashVol11 said:
People will really believe that there are 211 elected officials that don't want to "protect children" rather than consider the groundbreaking notion that Benny Johnson on Twitter isn't giving you the accurate story
Click to expand...
No story or attempt at explanation needed. I didn't take anything from a tweet. I actually looked up the votes with no commentary. 207 dems and 4 reps all voted "nay". I'm nothing like you as in a partisan hack fool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens and WeeohdeeWood
#8,781
#8,781
Vol since 77 said:
No story or attempt at explanation needed. I didn't take anything from a tweet. I actually looked up the votes with no commentary. 207 dems and 4 reps all voted "nay". I'm nothing like you as in a partisan hack fool.
Click to expand...
This is nakedly partisan hackery lol, thinking people voted against it because they don't want to "protect kids" is NY Post brain
Vol since 77 said:
We live in some very troubling times when 211 elected people vote against something like this. Children being protected should absolutely be one thing nearly everyone should agree on.
Click to expand...
 
#8,783
#8,783
Vol since 77 said:
Look at the "defender of all things trans" make another ignorant post. I understand that you're extremely partisan and a fool.
Click to expand...
You don't have anything to say except weird deflections because you can't argue the point. Using "you defend a minority group" as an insult should tell you you're not the good guy, but alas
 
#8,785
#8,785
C-south said:
What point is there to argue? It’s ridiculous it’s even came to this.
Click to expand...
People need to stop letting their opinions be shaped by the Benny Johnsons of the world and just automatically believing that everyone on the other side of the aisle is evil. When BJ says things like "TWO. HUNDRED. PEOPLE. VOTED AGAINST CHILDREN" you should be able to recognize he's being dishonest rather than automatically believing that half of Congress is anti-children
 
#8,786
#8,786
NashVol11 said:
People need to stop letting their opinions be shaped by the Benny Johnsons of the world and just automatically believing that everyone on the other side of the aisle is evil. When BJ says things like "TWO. HUNDRED. PEOPLE. VOTED AGAINST CHILDREN" you should be able to recognize he's being dishonest rather than automatically believing that half of Congress is anti-children
Click to expand...
My opinion is not based on a tweet. I went straight to the actual govt website that shows who voted, without any comments. You're just pissed off because I actually stated how many people voted against something (I included the numbskulls on both sides as well). The only deflection going on is on your part, but that's par for the course for you. Hope you have Merry Christmas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeeohdeeWood
#8,787
#8,787
Vol since 77 said:
My opinion is not based on a tweet. I went straight to the actual govt website that shows who voted, without any comments. You're just pissed off because I actually stated how many people voted against something (I included the numbskulls on both sides as well). The only deflection going on is on your part, but that's par for the course for you. Hope you have Merry Christmas.
Click to expand...
Great, now you can maybe reach the 5th grade-level approach of figuring out why people voted against it instead of assuming "everyone is sick/evil/demented/troubling times" because Benny Johnson said so
 
#8,788
#8,788
NashVol11 said:
People need to stop letting their opinions be shaped by the Benny Johnsons of the world and just automatically believing that everyone on the other side of the aisle is evil. When BJ says things like "TWO. HUNDRED. PEOPLE. VOTED AGAINST CHILDREN" you should be able to recognize he's being dishonest rather than automatically believing that half of Congress is anti-children
Click to expand...
Here is the bill. What did they vote against?

 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77
#8,798
#8,798
NashVol11 said:
This is nakedly partisan hackery lol, thinking people voted against it because they don't want to "protect kids" is NY Post brain
Click to expand...
Serious question: what did they vote against? By this I mean what in the bill was against their principles? I would have voted against the criminalization because I do not believe it is a federal matter and should be left up to the states. I would have voted for the prevention of federal dollars for any "medical" treatment" for the exact same reason.
 
#8,799
#8,799
GroverCleveland said:
Serious question: what did they vote against? By this I mean what in the bill was against their principles? I would have voted against the criminalization because I do not believe it is a federal matter and should be left up to the states. I would have voted for the prevention of federal dollars for any "medical" treatment" for the exact same reason.
Click to expand...
Putting doctors and parents in jail for any type of gender-affirming care broadly, which includes a lot more than just surgeries that rarely if ever happen anyway, is stupid as hell which is why this was never going anywhere. House Republicans just wanted to yell at trans people again
 
#8,800
#8,800
NashVol11 said:
Putting doctors and parents in jail for any type of gender-affirming care broadly, which includes a lot more than just surgeries that rarely if ever happen anyway, is stupid as hell which is why this was never going anywhere. House Republicans just wanted to yell at trans people again
Click to expand...
Please, if you can, refrain from the ad hominem attacks. I'm really trying to understand where you're coming from but the "stupid as hell" and "wanted to yell...again" phrases are juvenile.

Is it not correct there were two bills as described above, one about federal money and another about criminalization? If this is so, why would the dems vote against banning federal dollars for such procedures, especially if they are rare as you stated? I would completely agree with voting against a bill making it criminal for the reason stated above and voting for a bill preventing federal funds for any such procedures.

To be sure, if I were in the Tennessee legislature, I would vote to criminalize these type of procedures for anyone under 18.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top