W.TN.Orange Blood
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 154,693
- Likes
- 416,095
People will really believe that there are 211 elected officials that don't want to "protect children" rather than consider the groundbreaking notion that Benny Johnson on Twitter isn't giving you the accurate storyWe live in some very troubling times when 211 elected people vote against something like this. Children being protected should absolutely be one thing nearly everyone should agree on.
No story or attempt at explanation needed. I didn't take anything from a tweet. I actually looked up the votes with no commentary. 207 dems and 4 reps all voted "nay". I'm nothing like you as in a partisan hack fool.People will really believe that there are 211 elected officials that don't want to "protect children" rather than consider the groundbreaking notion that Benny Johnson on Twitter isn't giving you the accurate story
This is nakedly partisan hackery lol, thinking people voted against it because they don't want to "protect kids" is NY Post brainNo story or attempt at explanation needed. I didn't take anything from a tweet. I actually looked up the votes with no commentary. 207 dems and 4 reps all voted "nay". I'm nothing like you as in a partisan hack fool.
We live in some very troubling times when 211 elected people vote against something like this. Children being protected should absolutely be one thing nearly everyone should agree on.
You don't have anything to say except weird deflections because you can't argue the point. Using "you defend a minority group" as an insult should tell you you're not the good guy, but alasLook at the "defender of all things trans" make another ignorant post. I understand that you're extremely partisan and a fool.
People need to stop letting their opinions be shaped by the Benny Johnsons of the world and just automatically believing that everyone on the other side of the aisle is evil. When BJ says things like "TWO. HUNDRED. PEOPLE. VOTED AGAINST CHILDREN" you should be able to recognize he's being dishonest rather than automatically believing that half of Congress is anti-childrenWhat point is there to argue? It’s ridiculous it’s even came to this.
My opinion is not based on a tweet. I went straight to the actual govt website that shows who voted, without any comments. You're just pissed off because I actually stated how many people voted against something (I included the numbskulls on both sides as well). The only deflection going on is on your part, but that's par for the course for you. Hope you have Merry Christmas.People need to stop letting their opinions be shaped by the Benny Johnsons of the world and just automatically believing that everyone on the other side of the aisle is evil. When BJ says things like "TWO. HUNDRED. PEOPLE. VOTED AGAINST CHILDREN" you should be able to recognize he's being dishonest rather than automatically believing that half of Congress is anti-children
Great, now you can maybe reach the 5th grade-level approach of figuring out why people voted against it instead of assuming "everyone is sick/evil/demented/troubling times" because Benny Johnson said soMy opinion is not based on a tweet. I went straight to the actual govt website that shows who voted, without any comments. You're just pissed off because I actually stated how many people voted against something (I included the numbskulls on both sides as well). The only deflection going on is on your part, but that's par for the course for you. Hope you have Merry Christmas.
Here is the bill. What did they vote against?People need to stop letting their opinions be shaped by the Benny Johnsons of the world and just automatically believing that everyone on the other side of the aisle is evil. When BJ says things like "TWO. HUNDRED. PEOPLE. VOTED AGAINST CHILDREN" you should be able to recognize he's being dishonest rather than automatically believing that half of Congress is anti-children
