NashVol11
Gloomed to Fail
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 25,763
- Likes
- 9,778
My point exactly, just deflecting, "yawn" and "ok" because you know just as well as I do that it's based on fear and hypotheticals rather than any actual result
You're welcome to cling to age 35-44 200m sprinters. Like I said, there's no sport where one of the best players is trans and there never has beenWe gave you world record holders and D1 champions. And they still weren’t enough for you. You’re setting an impossible standard and then attempting to use that standard to proclaim victory over reality.
The obvious reality that anyone who is being honest has to accept is that there’s numerous advantages males maintain in sports over females regardless of hormone therapy. Some of them are even improved by hormone therapy
My point exactly, just deflecting, "yawn" and "ok" because you know just as well as I do that it's based on fear and hypotheticals rather than "dominance" in practice
I think it is pretty whiny to claim that like 0.1% trans participation in a sport where they don't dominate at all and rarely win is "ruining" itNobody cares if they dominate or not. It’s absurd. It’s ridiculous women/girls are being subjected to this nonsense and all it entails. A dude that is so off in the head he thinks he’s a chic has more issues he needs to deal with than ruining sports for females.
I think it is pretty whiny to claim that like 0.1% trans participation in a sport where they don't dominate at all and rarely win is "ruining" it
Absolutely, if like 8 of the top 10 players in the WNBA were trans I would understand the argument. Even then, I think the league could address it at the time rather than banning all trans women from sports "preemptively" when it hasn't resulted in any of the "dominance" people keep implying it willWho’s claiming trans people ruin the WNBA?
Is there a level to this that would change your mind?
If one day 3/5 of the starters on an all star team were trans, would you reconsider your stance?
Damn, dude. Bumped a 3 yr old post to share that nuggetApparently I missed this years ago.
I did and don’t. Especially if your mom’s a whore. I learned the man who raised me wasn’t my father. I think he knew, and if so I respect him even more for never telling me. It’s been wild.
But in all honesty, it’s cool information to have
I think it is pretty whiny to claim that like 0.1% trans participation in a sport where they don't dominate at all and rarely win is "ruining" it
Absolutely, if like 8 of the top 10 players in the WNBA were trans I would understand the argument. Even then, I think the league could address it at the time rather than banning all trans women from sports "preemptively" when it hasn't resulted in any of the "dominance" people keep implying it will
Lia Thomas isn't one of the best women's freestyle swimmers and Rachel whoever isn't one of the best female cyclists, and neither ever was. Both would get destroyed by the biological women who are/were actually the best
As a woman, I do not know how other women support this kind of BS.. I think they are just too afraid of the backlash for disagreeing with itCycling, like several sports, has age categories. Rachel McKinnon picked up cycling after her transition and demolished a bunch of women in her age category that had been training and competing their entire lives.
Plenty of people can see 0.1% of the population win a race every now and then without trying to segregate them out of sports. There is far more backlash for standing up for trans people than for piling on and bullying themAs a woman, I do not know how other women support this kind of BS.. I think they are just too afraid of the backlash for disagreeing with it
The female athletes that compete against these trans disagree with you. Why can't you just say "men should not be allowed to compete in women's sports?" It boggles my mind that liberals like you hem and haw, deflect etc etc to avoid saying that. It's not a tough callI think it is pretty whiny to claim that like 0.1% trans participation in a sport where they don't dominate at all and rarely win is "ruining" it
Almost all of them don't. A few opportunists certainly doThe female athletes that compete against these trans disagree with you.
Men don't compete in women's sports, which is why there are hormone requirements etc. for trans women to participateWhy can't you just say "men should not be allowed to compete in women's sports?" It boggles my mind that liberals like you hem and haw, deflect etc etc to avoid saying that. It's not a tough call
Taking hormones does not change your sex. That's where you're misguided. Men in my family who've been treated for prostate cancer were treated with estrogen. It didn't change their sex. Lebron doesn't qualify for the WNBA if you give him two years of hormone treatmentsAlmost all of them don't. A few opportunists certainly do
Men don't compete in women's sports, which is why there are hormone requirements etc. for trans women to participate
Does it have age categories for major races? Does the Tour de France have 8 winners per year for different age groups or one winner? What about the UCI Women's World Tour? Or are you just citing the equivalent of the Senior PGA TourCycling, like several sports, has age categories. Rachel McKinnon picked up cycling after her transition and demolished a bunch of women in her age category that had been training and competing their entire lives.
Does it have age categories for major races? Does the Tour de France have 8 winners per year for different age groups or one winner? What about the UCI Women's World Tour? Or are you just citing the equivalent of the Senior PGA Tour