SergeantVol
Sarge4Mod
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2010
- Messages
- 14,305
- Likes
- 13,552
By his reasoning in other posts, they are not just minorities, but actually blacks.
This is where ****s about to get real antisemetic. He's about to tell you that Jews aren't real Jews. Black people are the real Jews. I've spoke to some black seperatist before. They're insane. You can't reason with them because if you disagree it's only because of your racism
How does white supremacy hurt black people? You're going to have to elaborate.
Yes the study did. The study addressed the use of force against suspects of all races. If your bogus claim were true, there would've been a significant difference due to the number of innocent black men you claim are targeted by the police. But the study showed the complete opposite. That police are more likely to use force against white suspects
This is where ****s about to get real antisemetic. He's about to tell you that Jews aren't real Jews. Black people are the real Jews. I've spoke to some black seperatist before. They're insane. You can't reason with them because if you disagree it's only because of your racism
Dobbs has evidently also never seen an East African.
If they had stone statues of themselves from ancient times, the white racialist equivalent of Dobbs would be claiming that it was proof that white people - with narrow noses and narrow faces had actually been the first inhabitants of Africa.
Could it be possible that people hundreds of years ago who may not have ever seen all the people from around the world (it's not like there were pictures, tv, internet, etc...) just assumed that if people were darker than them they appeared black. Just like if someone was lighter they were just white? Could it be possible people hundreds of years ago just lumped others into the same race? Hey, they look black. Hey, those guys look white?
"Both the Olmecs and West Africans have short flat noses because they lived in wet tropical areas....these same traits are seen in Eastern Asian and Pacific populations also".
It's a great read. It talks about how your hero attempts to rob native cultures of their accomplishments and claim them as the accomplishments of black people.
http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/current/vansertima.pdf
They didn't. It's psuedo science because he doesn't understand that people living in similar conditions will adopt similar traits without being in anyway genetically the same people.
I agree. This is the primary reason I think the theory that the ancient Egyptians were black Sub-Saharan Africans north of the Sahara falls flat. I don't doubt that such people were among Egypt's demographics, but I do not believe they were the "power establishment," the decision-makers and power brokers of ancient Egypt, as Dobbs suggests.
I think we see this phenomenon - associating art with racial demographics - in ancient Greece as well. Grecian urns often portray "black men," but that's largely because darkness is associated with masculinity and hardness in the ancient Greek mind. Not because black men were actually warriors and/or leaders in ancient Greece.