The Problem of Whiteness

So in D4H's logic, there is only black and white? No other races? If there was other races, then they would not have been oppressed nearly as much as blacks? Am I correct?
 
By his reasoning in other posts, they are not just minorities, but actually blacks.

This is where ****s about to get real antisemetic. He's about to tell you that Jews aren't real Jews. Black people are the real Jews. I've spoke to some black seperatist before. They're insane. You can't reason with them because if you disagree it's only because of your racism
 
D4H is more wrong about politics and life then he is about his football predictions. You would think he would realize he is lost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
This is where ****s about to get real antisemetic. He's about to tell you that Jews aren't real Jews. Black people are the real Jews. I've spoke to some black seperatist before. They're insane. You can't reason with them because if you disagree it's only because of your racism

He isn't about to say, he's been alluding to it for the last page and a half. It's just funny that York pointed out the media situation with respect to giving up control to black. Thus, we arrive at a contraction; black and ~black.
 
He isn't about to say, he's been alluding to it for the last page and a half. It's just funny that York pointed out the media situation with respect to giving up control to black. Thus, we arrive at a contraction; black and ~black.

What's the difference between black and ~black?
 
I've never put anyone on ignore and swore I would not, but D4H and his ignorant ass level of black inferiority has me tempted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
That's harsh ape..... I've got nothing but love for you bra

132324143_amazoncom-ape-generals---padded-bra---12-ape-generals-.jpg
 
I've never put anyone on ignore and swore I would not, but D4H and his ignorant ass level of black inferiority has me tempted.

I've defended him. He's gone off the rails today. Usually, I support trainwrecks. Nope.
 
How does white supremacy hurt black people? You're going to have to elaborate.

Yes the study did. The study addressed the use of force against suspects of all races. If your bogus claim were true, there would've been a significant difference due to the number of innocent black men you claim are targeted by the police. But the study showed the complete opposite. That police are more likely to use force against white suspects

You seem to fall back to that question constantly.
You're a couple post away from me concluding that you are a white supremacist. Are you? If not, do you mainly agree or disagree with them?

I'll try to throw out a few ways that white supremacy could hurt if left unchecked.

98% of top jobs go through a hiring process controlled by white people (made up stat but probably close) They only hire whites.

Major contractors (white) only hire white subcontractors.

Top universities deny non white applicants.

Refusal to sell houses to black people in better school districts.

But let's play your game and assume white supremacy in no way harms minorities ability to improve their plight. Any failure is due to personal choices and liberal policies.

Do you support the concept of white supremacy?
Do you think it has an overall positive effect or negative effect?
Do you personally believe the white race is the over all superior race?
 
This is where ****s about to get real antisemetic. He's about to tell you that Jews aren't real Jews. Black people are the real Jews. I've spoke to some black seperatist before. They're insane. You can't reason with them because if you disagree it's only because of your racism

No.

Most modern day black people are not the "real jews". We are just black. The only point I was making when it came to the biblical account is that the real jews were phenotypically black aka they looked like other black people. They just were a different ethnic group and had a different religion.

Most modern day "white" jews are not really white. They are mulattos. The blackness is just way down the family tree. Its why alot of "white" jews have atypical features for a white person. We all know jews have very curly hair almost kinky in texture. That sort of hair is common among people mixed with black. But its very rare for a person with non-black ancestry to have hair like that. Almost every other race on earth has very straight hair except for black people. Then there are the noses which are larger than typical europeans. And finally the genetics which show that most european jews have African ancestry while non-jews in europe largely don't.

What happened is when Jews had to flee Palestine they spread across the globe. Many stayed in Africa such as the Falasha Jews who went to places like Ethiopia and intermarried with the local population. Same with the Sepharidic Jews that went to North Africa. Jews also went to Europe. It was there that they intermarried with Europeans. That is where the modern population of white European Jews (the Ashkenazi) come from.
 
Last edited:
Dobbs has evidently also never seen an East African.

If they had stone statues of themselves from ancient times, the white racialist equivalent of Dobbs would be claiming that it was proof that white people - with narrow noses and narrow faces had actually been the first inhabitants of Africa.

No. I have. That's the beauty of the black race. We are the original humans so everyone else comes from us. We have the features of all of humanity within us.

Just look at the San Bushmen of Namibia. They are black. They have always lived in Africa forever. They have no genes from anywhere else on earth. And yet they have East Asian features. So much so that some of them could pass as Asian if they wanted. Like the girl below on the left.

ef8dc92b5dd01eee1461c46ea960833f.jpg


That is the BEAUTY of Africa.
 
Could it be possible that people hundreds of years ago who may not have ever seen all the people from around the world (it's not like there were pictures, tv, internet, etc...) just assumed that if people were darker than them they appeared black. Just like if someone was lighter they were just white? Could it be possible people hundreds of years ago just lumped others into the same race? Hey, they look black. Hey, those guys look white?

We are not talking about random people here. Herodotus is considered the "Father of History" in western civilization. He was an educated Greek scholar who traveled the globe. In his book on world history he described the Ancient Egyptians as "black skinned and wooly haired."

This was not some random guy in the street just musing on topics. These were serious scholars. As serious and intelligent as any in the world today. And these guys actually traveled the globe. Most scholars today probably do most of their research in front of a computer and rarely see the actual world.
 
"Both the Olmecs and West Africans have short flat noses because they lived in wet tropical areas....these same traits are seen in Eastern Asian and Pacific populations also".

It's a great read. It talks about how your hero attempts to rob native cultures of their accomplishments and claim them as the accomplishments of black people.
http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/current/vansertima.pdf

That's a complete lie. East Asians do not have wide noses and thick lips like West Africans.

This is the typical East Asian face. Very similar to the San Bushmen girl I posted above. Who looks very different than the typical West African or Olmec head.

BN-ER587_skface_G_20140924021357.jpg



I will agree that the Pacific Islanders like those in Papau New Guinea and Vanuatu look like West Africans. But that is because they are also black. Hell they were called "negritos" by the first European explorers who came upon those islands. Negritos translates to "little negroes." They also named the island these black people lived on "New Guinea" because the natives reminded these European explorers of natives they encountered in Guinea, West Africa.

So saying the Olmecs were like Pacific Islanders from Papau New Guinea doesn't help your argument at all. Those are just other black people. See the picture below of some modern people in Papau New Guinea.

pngbann.jpg__1500x670_q85_crop_subsampling-2.jpg



Now this looks more like the Olmec heads.
 
They didn't. It's psuedo science because he doesn't understand that people living in similar conditions will adopt similar traits without being in anyway genetically the same people.

Genetics? Who said anything about genetics? We're talking race. And in case you don't know the concept of race was created before anyone knew genetics existed.

Race is about PHENOTYPE not GENOTYPE. How you look determined your race not a blood test.

If race was determined by genetics then most African-Americans wouldn't be black since they have 25% or more white ancestry on average. And many Africans like the South Sudanese and Nigerians would be different races because they are genetically as different from one another as they are from Europeans.

But in our world the South Sudanese are not considered a different race than the Nigerians. And Africans Americans aren't considered white. All these groups are black even though they have very different genotypes. Because race in this society is based on how you look not what a blood test says.

But nice try trying to change the topic.
 
Most things I've read show their genetics being more similar to middle easterners than africans

LOL. Middle Easterners are mulattoes buddy. Combination of black and white.

Its why so many people thought Colin Kaepernick was Middle Eastern. He's a mulatto. And so are middle eastern people.
 
I agree. This is the primary reason I think the theory that the ancient Egyptians were black Sub-Saharan Africans north of the Sahara falls flat. I don't doubt that such people were among Egypt's demographics, but I do not believe they were the "power establishment," the decision-makers and power brokers of ancient Egypt, as Dobbs suggests.

I think we see this phenomenon - associating art with racial demographics - in ancient Greece as well. Grecian urns often portray "black men," but that's largely because darkness is associated with masculinity and hardness in the ancient Greek mind. Not because black men were actually warriors and/or leaders in ancient Greece.

LOL. Why am I not surprised?

Just like a white supremacist to think that.

Let me guess the black people in Ancient Egypt were just there as the help right?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top