The Official Indianapolis Colts Thread

like they did the first game?
I'm still waiting on your argument utvolpj. You wanna say the cards aren't a good team and give nothing to support that statment. I give u actual facts and stats to support my opinion. If u don't have any let this be a lesson. No one knows how ignorant you are until you start posting bs
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
I'm still waiting on your argument utvolpj. You wanna say the cards aren't a good team and give nothing to support that statment. I give u actual facts and stats to support my opinion. If u don't have any let this be a lesson. No one knows how ignorant you are until you start posting bs
Posted via VolNation Mobile

they lead a division in which they're the only team with a winning record (including one tied for the league lead in losses)

ML had a decent night but no TD's

a KO return was needed to get close

if you don't think KW is better than ML then you really shouldn't post much in the NFL forum
 
Like I said. Crappy fans.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Indy has "crappy fans." Okay, and I'm assuming you believe the Titans have some of the best fans in the NFL? I like your assumption that when - or if - the Colts start losing, the fans won't show up to the games. Well, the Titans started the season 0-6, and I didn't see any sold out games in LP field. I guess this would mean Titans fans also fall into your definition of "crappy fans."

You're obviously a very intelligent person who is just blatantly confused on this matter.
 
Wasn't a trolling attempt. Fuller, Harper, Finnegan, Griffin, and Hood will have a field day this Sunday. Looking forward to it.

Tennessee will continue to be the Colts red-headed step child on Sunday.

Enjoy watching the Colts in the playoffs this postseason.

:dance2:
 
they lead a division in which they're the only team with a winning record (including one tied for the league lead in losses)

ML had a decent night but no TD's

a KO return was needed to get close

if you don't think KW is better than ML then you really shouldn't post much in the NFL forum

I do think warner is better, but that doesn't mean warner comes out and throws all over our defense either. he's been known to throw multiple ints and have bad games. He's not manning or brady, he's far from it. I think the cardinals are still a good team with leinart as long as he plays like he did against us. we won because of good D, a big run, and vy's drive. Not because the cardinals aren't a good team without warner. and ill put my NFL knowlege against anyones on this board.
 
Contrary to popular ignorance, you don't have to be an English teacher to know how to spell correctly.

you also don't have to be dork, or an a** and point out errors in grammar or spelling. You know what people post to welcome all the newbies on the nation. It usually goes like this. A welcome greeting, followed by a warning about people like you who are gonna point out misspelled words and errors in grammar. you are the posters that 99% of volnation can't stand. So good day sir and this is for you.

im knot gowing two respawned tooo yur posts anemoree
 
Tennessee will continue to be the Colts red-headed step child on Sunday.

Enjoy watching the Colts in the playoffs this postseason.

:dance2:

...they...they've split games each season the last 3 years, most times by close scores. How does that make one a red-headed step-child to the other?
 
Maybe because we have dominated this division as of late

yeah but as far as competition with a team...if they've been splitting the series quite often and recently, that doesn't make one team more dominant over the other

It'd be like if we split for 3-4 years with UK in bball (win at home, they win away), but then they win the SEC championship each year. Sure they're winning conference each year, but that doesn't make them dominant over us; the scores in the teams' games against each other show that
 
yeah but as far as competition with a team...if they've been splitting the series quite often and recently, that doesn't make one team more dominant over the other

It'd be like if we split for 3-4 years with UK in bball (win at home, they win away), but then they win the SEC championship each year. Sure they're winning conference each year, but that doesn't make them dominant over us; the scores in the teams' games against each other show that

If my memory serves me correctly 2 of those 3 Titans wins were when we played our back ups
 
Fair enough and it's true the Colts have owned the division for the last decade but splitting the last 6 with the Titans doesn't mean they own them like someone else stated.

I am almost sure 2 of those wins by the Titans were against or back ups
 
Or six out of the last seven. Not sure what else you have to do to dominate a division.

Someone else said the Titans were the Colts' "red-headed step-child" and he said they dominated it "as of late." Titans won the division last year and they've split the last 6 games. Colts have obviously been better, but the Titans haven't been dominated "as of late."
 
Or six out of the last seven. Not sure what else you have to do to dominate a division.

yeah for the 7 years we have had the AFC south the colts have dominated. BUT as of late the titans won the south last yr. SO.....
 
you also don't have to be dork, or an a** and point out errors in grammar or spelling. You know what people post to welcome all the newbies on the nation. It usually goes like this. A welcome greeting, followed by a warning about people like you who are gonna point out misspelled words and errors in grammar. you are the posters that 99% of volnation can't stand. So good day sir and this is for you.

im knot gowing two respawned tooo yur posts anemoree

Crawl back into your hole. No one will miss you around here.

:hi:
 

Advertisement



Back
Top