The Most Frightening Aspect of the GOP Debate

So why can't 8188 be (mostly) for railroads but against one way that some railroads were helped to be created?

I didn't say he can't. He can be for whatever he wishes. I already said that early on in this thread.
 
I didn't say he can't. He can be for whatever he wishes. I already said that early on in this thread.

Did you claim he was being inconsistent for being for railroads in general and against railroads using eminent domain?
 
Did you claim he was being inconsistent for being for railroads in general and against railroads using eminent domain?

Yes I did claim that I think holding such a position is inconsistent. I never said anyone must accept my opinion. i specifically said Vol8188 is free to hold whatever opinions he wants and that I care not to convince him otherwise.
 
8188- doesnt this make you feel like you are looking in a mirror? :)

lol I did have that thought. I may be equally hardheaded, but surely I don't speak in circles and avoid direct questions to that level....do I?
 
lol I did have that thought. I may be equally hardheaded, but surely I don't speak in circles and avoid direct questions to that level....do I?

Nah. You are not that bad. :)

Hope you are doing well amigo..
 

VN Store



Back
Top