madtownvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2014
- Messages
- 7,103
- Likes
- 30,489
A little division one college called Quinnipiac used to use this same strategy and achieved relative success. I believe they called it a gold rush, or something similar. They were definitely undermanned but in 2017 they made it to the Sweet 16 before losing to number one seed South Carolina in a nailbiter (OK that part is not true). I watched them defeat the number four and number five seeds and was pretty impressed with their team.
Great historical recall.
This example also raises the question of why Geno, Dawn, Vic, Kim Mulkey, and other elite coaches have not adopted some version of "this system". We can raise the same question on the men's side, where you find periodic attempts to run something lilke this but few sustained example of success.
Are these elite coaches just too set in their ways or just not visionary enough to "see" the genius of "the system?," which in one form or another has been around a long time.
For a school like Quinipiac or say Marshall, who are always recruiting from the mid to lower tier of the talent pool, going kamikaze might be a decent strategy. If you can create a enough chaos, maybe you can throw a more talented team off their game and get the occasional upset.
I think we have seen with the LVs, that once good teams have a scout on this chaotic, mad scramble approach, they figure out how to manage it pretty well and exploit its gaps. So, then we are in a trade-off situation. Does chaos factor create enough positive plays to outweigh the "exploited" weaknesses?
Another relevant question is this: When you can recruit from the upper levels of the talent pool, does this system, which may maximize the collective potential of "workhorse" players, get the best out of "race horse" players?
We have some preliminary data points from the pre-season but the conference games should give us a more definitive answer.

