The Impeachment Thread

[VolnJC]

 

[luthervol]

Trying to overthrow a President and influence an election should have consequences

As should bribing a foreign leader to interfere with our elections.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

"We will impeach Trump. We'll find a reason"......Nancy Pelosi, November 2016.

"To potentially cheat in the elections"....... Adam Schiff, January 2020.

Based on Schiff's line of thinking the whole government should be tossed out....they all have the potential to cheat.

Obstructing Congress. When Trump vetoes a bill is that obstruction of Congress? Is that the new standard?

 

[37L1]

You can't argue both sides.

So who is arguing both sides?

The Democrats in the House have been very consistent in voting en bloc but not for the Articles of Impeachment. So . . . did Miss Nancy give them permission this one time?

 

[Orange_Crush]

As should bribing a foreign leader to interfere with our elections.

They'll get to Biden and the Democrat House members soon enough. Don't worry.

 

[Mick]

So who is arguing both sides?

The Democrats in the House have been very consistent in voting en bloc but not for the Articles of Impeachment. So . . . did Miss Nancy give them permission this one time?

You're defending a half cocked argument from Spacecoast the the Dems voted down party lines. That was incorrect. It was the R's that voted down party lines.

 

[hUTch2002]

Seems like old bug eyes stepped in it

He rolls in it and no one seems to gas.

 

[Orange defense]

It was a smart thing to wrap this thing up today in two hours. They debunked everything in their arguments in short notice against the democrats. Now, the whistleblower comes into question. Who is he? Does he exists? What did he say in the basement? If they go to witnesses, then how are they going to subpoena him, if we don’t know who he is? How would they get him to testify? Certainly they would have to give his name up, or face what? If they go to witnesses, then that whistleblower, the Bidens, and others would have to come in. This is going to be good, especially the whistleblower.

 

[hUTch2002]

As should bribing a foreign leader to interfere with our elections.

You must not be watching because that bs is being blown out of the water today.

 

[AM64]

You posted this in plain simple English where most people can read & understand it. But for Loother, you needed to bring your crayons & your coloring book for the dynamic visual effect.

Luther's political dyslexia runs well beyond words. Even pictures aren't going to make a breakthrough ... it's terminal.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

You must not be watching because that bs is being blown out of the water today.

Don't try and reason with him. He's completely gone way over into the dark side w/his comrades & won't return.

 

[VolnJC]

 

[37L1]

You're defending a half cocked argument from Spacecoast the the Dems voted down party lines. That was incorrect. It was the R's that voted down party lines.

No I'm not. I'm just providing indicators that the House articles of impeachment are so weak that they couldn't get the full support of their own party members.

So far, that's the only instance in this POS that has shown any bipartisan agreement and it didn't go the way you wanted it to. I guess you spin it that the Democrats are the only reasonable ones by this example?

Lolololololololololololol.

 

[hUTch2002]

Jay Sekulow said, “The anti-corruption court of Ukraine did not commence its work until September 5th of 2019.”

He also just said Ukraine was not the only aid withheld.

Afghanistan - over $100M held in Sept 2019 due to concerns with...wait for it...government corruption

El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala - June 2019, $500M

Lebanon - $105M, June 2019

He mentioned a couple others as well but you get the idea. Pack it up Dems. It’s over.

 

[Orange defense]

Bring it on. I want to know who the whistleblower is? Adam Schifftt, wants witnesses, then fine. He has got to be nervous now, even if he wanted witnesses. They can’t hide the whistleblower, because he is a big part of this trial. They are going to want the whistleblower to testify. I want the Bidens in as well. If we’re going to do this right, then I don’t have a problem with Trump’s team testifying at all. A trade for a trade is fair.

 

[AM64]

View attachment 256365

That kind of thinking is treasonous. However, for a political bloc that seeks to rule by propaganda, intimidation, and good old fashioned brain washing; it's hardly surprising. His real message would be "the election can't be left to those other voters".

 

[Orange_Crush]

You must not be watching because that bs is being blown out of the water today.

He doesn't care, nor can he process anything but propaganda.

 

[Mick]

No I'm not. I'm just providing indicators that the House articles of impeachment are so weak that they couldn't get the full support of their own party members.

So far, that's the only instance in this POS that has shown any bipartisan agreement and it didn't go the way you wanted it to. I guess you spin it that the Democrats are the only reasonable ones by this example?

Lolololololololololololol.

WOW!

 

[volfanjustin]

As should bribing a foreign leader to interfere with our elections.

When that happens let me know and I will agree with you

 

[vols40]

What???? They are completely separate events. Trump provides multiple reasons for investigations.

Such as lying under oath? Don't confuse philosophical differences as in a way to approach unelecting a duly elected president. The Constitution is clear on impeachment and without bipartisan support it must be avoided at all cost. But libs in their ever searching ends justify the means crapolo do not understand this. High crimes treason and bribery. Anything as serious as treason or anything more serious as bribery is the threshold for Impeachment. But you keep riding the corrupt Schift-sack we on the other side prefer it this way.

 

[Orange defense]

You democrats here and abroad is scared to death about the whistleblower. Don’t deny it demos. You know you’re wrong, and prove it here about the whistleblower.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

That kind of thinking is treasonous. However, for a political bloc that seeks to rule by propaganda, intimidation, and good old fashioned brain washing; it's hardly surprising. His real message would be "the election can't be left to those other voters".

....And to think the media has deemed this bozo the new "rock star"of politics. The media's new "darling".

 

[Mick]

You democrats here and abroad is scared to death about the whistleblower. Don’t deny it demos. You know you’re wrong, and prove it here about the whistleblower.

Here and abroad? Nationalism is the way to rid the world of democrats? There's no wonder you got laughed out of the RF.

 

[Orange defense]

But they won’t. They’ll bypass the questions here about the whistleblower. You’ll run from the questions.

 

[vols40]

I'm not sure that Ciarmella was the so called whistleblower. I'm not sure there was an actual "whistleblower," but that the WB is a fictional person made up by Schiff and staff, to take advantage of the whistleblower statute. I wouldn't call Ciarmella as a witness. I'm sure he was in on it, but that's as far as I would go.

I feel the most important thing about this is the level with which Schift worked with Eric C. Eric C should be prosecuted for this ad a deterrent for future hacks. If you are going to put the country through something like this it had definitely better be on the up. And to the extent Schift was in on facilitating this should be held accountable.