The Impeachment Thread

#33,451
#33,451
vols40 said:
Hey genius remind me exactly when the last time the Republicans did not win this seat? I'll wait.
Click to expand...
When Democrat Mark Udall defeated Republican Bob Schaffer in 2008, I suppose? I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. The other Senator from Colorado is Michael Bennet, who is a Democrat.
 
#33,452
#33,452
#33,458
#33,458
0nelilreb said:
Is that one night all you wanted us to see ?
Click to expand...

I realize this is a strong one to stomach and that you're dizzy from the reality being dropped on you like a ton of bricks - but please try to keep up.

The assertion was that Maddow doesn't have anyone that watches her show when, clearly, she does.

1579126237327.png

The real question is whether or not that this will be the part where you'll double down against a obvious whiff by making points against arguments that aren't being had.
 
#33,459
#33,459
BowlBrother85 said:
None of her superiors in the state department have said anything at all resembling this. Her credentials have been praised, as has her experience and integrity. This is a ridiculous fantasy based on nothing but the wishful thinking of the right. She was the United States Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan under George W. Bush from 2005-2008. The attempts by the right to portray her as a partisan, motivated by political animus, are not supported by anything in her history or anything of substance which is currently on the record.
Click to expand...
WHere did hj mention party?

Dubya was swamp rat piece of ... as well. When will everyone realize this isn't a R vs D thing?
 
#33,460
#33,460
Septic said:
I realize this is a strong one to stomach and that you're dizzy from the reality being dropped on you like a ton of bricks - but please try to keep up.

The assertion was that Maddow doesn't have anyone that watches her show when, clearly, she does.

View attachment 254537

The real question is whether or not that this will be the part where you'll double down against a obvious whiff by making points against arguments that aren't being had.
Click to expand...

So it was just one night you wanted us to see . Why are you so mad at people asking a simple question . Every time somebody asks something you act like your panties are all in a bunch . Maybe when you pull them out you can rejoin the polite discussion we were having and stop being a little Biotch. 😘
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and vols40
#33,463
#33,463
zeppelin128 said:
I haven't watched Maddow since she moderated a debate a couple months ago. But I'm pretty sure her, Hannity, and Tucker are usually all bunched together concerning number of viewers per night.
Click to expand...

I know they are . That’s where the money is at . I was just pulling an answer out of septic so I could respond in kind to him from earlier . Just to be honest .
 
#33,466
#33,466
Orange_Crush said:
WHere did hj mention party?

Dubya was swamp rat piece of ... as well. When will everyone realize this isn't a R vs D thing?
Click to expand...
His accusations weren't founded on anything which is currently on the record. There is nothing to indicate that Marie Yovanovitch was doing anything other than demonstrating professionalism and integrity. She simply wasn't in accord with placing a hold on much needed military aid to the Ukraine, in exchange for a campaign favor for Trump. It now appears that she was basically being stalked, because she was perceived to be a stumbling block into these plans. It's pretty outrageous what the Trump goon Robert Hyde was doing. I'm not sure if what Hyde was doing was illegal... but it looks it may have been.
 
#33,471
#33,471
BowlBrother85 said:
His accusations weren't founded on anything which is currently on the record. There is nothing to indicate that Marie Yovanovitch was doing anything other than demonstrating professionalism and integrity. She simply wasn't in accord with placing a hold on much needed military aid to the Ukraine, in exchange for a campaign favor for Trump. It now appears that she was basically being stalked, because she was perceived to be a stumbling block into these plans. It's pretty outrageous what the Trump goon Robert Hyde was doing. I'm not sure if what Hyde was doing was illegal... but it looks it may have been.
Click to expand...

So why muddy the water with the post I quoted? We'll see how this all bakes out. Defending her by putting her in bed with George W Bush is no defense at all.
 
#33,472
#33,472
SpaceCoastVol said:
How can those senators that are running against him allowed to sit in judgement? Shouldn't they recuse themselves? No. Of course not. Thhe only spent a few hours last night talking about how dispicable Mr Trump is, but they will be impartial.
Click to expand...

It is strange how we do that .
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#33,473
#33,473
Orange_Crush said:
So why muddy the water with the post I quoted? We'll see how this all bakes out. Defending her by putting her in bed with George W Bush is no defense at all.
Click to expand...
Nothing I've seen indicates that she needs a defense. Nothing points to her being a political partisan... or that she has been motivated by an animus against the Trump administration.
 
#33,474
#33,474
BowlBrother85 said:
Nothing I've seen indicates that she needs a defense. Nothing points to her being a political partisan... or that she has been motivated by an animus against the Trump administration.
Click to expand...
And yet you came to her defense with partisan horse-caca. Seems you may want to stop and get your thoughts in order.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top