The Impeachment Thread

#31,856
#31,856
hog88 said:
What are Trumps kids and Kushner doing now vs before?
Click to expand...
Per Wikipedia:

Jared Kushner's role in the Trump Administration is defined as "White House Office of American Innovation", where Kushner reportedly has been focusing on improving governmental efforts with regard to Veteran's Affairs, information technology contracting, and the opioid crisis."

He definitely wasn't doing this before Trump was inaugurated... and it's safe to say that he wouldn't be doing it now, if literally anyone else in the country but his father-in-law was the President of the United States.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick
#31,857
#31,857
Has anyone heard anything from Meathead (Brennan) since news released that Durham will is subpoenaing his emails?
 
Last edited:
#31,858
#31,858
BowlBrother85 said:
Per Wikipedia:

Jared Kushner's role in the Trump Administration is defined as "White House Office of American Innovation", where Kushner reportedly has been focusing on improving governmental efforts with regard to Veteran's Affairs, information technology contracting, and the opioid crisis."

He definitely wasn't doing this before Trump was inaugurated... and it's safe to say that he wouldn't be doing it now, if literally anyone else in the country but his father-in-law was the President of the United States.
Click to expand...

Again I thought this was an income discussion.
 
#31,863
#31,863
C-south said:
It’s ok for your dad to get you a ceremonial job on the board of a corrupt company of which you know nothing about making $83k a month for doing nothing but it’s wrong to work with your dad to try and solve problems with foreign policy.
Click to expand...
... and threaten the elected government of said country to fire a prosecutor involved in an investigation... (while VP of the USA)... AND then subsequently brag about it on video.


But there's nothing to see there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, Orangeburst and C-south
#31,867
#31,867
hog88 said:
Again I thought this was an income discussion.
Click to expand...
There are good articles in both "Newsweek" and "Business Insider" about how Jared Kushner got into Harvard. It's basically the same type of activity as the college admissions scandal that has ensnared Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman. Daddy bought his way in... with some help from an administrator who was on the take.
 
#31,869
#31,869
BowlBrother85 said:
There are good articles in both "Newsweek" and "Business Insider" about how Jared Kushner got into Harvard. It's basically the same type of activity as the college admissions scandal that has ensnared Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman. Daddy bought his way in... with some help from an administrator who was on the take.
Click to expand...

Should’ve just claimed to be Native American.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77, AM64 and 1972 Grad
#31,870
#31,870
PeaceCorpsVol said:
Aw definitely triggered you snowflake.
Click to expand...
The only one coming across as triggered is you. I assume you think you're winning with this "snowflake" talk, but you're really not. It's called deflection because you've yet to provide anything factual to support your argument. I kind of feel sad for you, even if you are being an ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#31,871
#31,871
BowlBrother85 said:
There are good articles in both "Newsweek" and "Business Insider" about how Jared Kushner got into Harvard. It's basically the same type of activity as the college admissions scandal that has ensnared Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman. Daddy bought his way in... with some help from an administrator who was on the take.
Click to expand...

WTF does that have to do with a discussion on his income today?
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and AM64
#31,872
#31,872
SpaceCoastVol said:
... and threaten the elected government of said country to fire a prosecutor involved in an investigation... (while VP of the USA)... AND then subsequently brag about it on video.


But there's nothing to see there.
Click to expand...
For about the hundredth time: Viktor Shokin was fired because he WASN'T investigating corruption in the Ukraine. He failed to obtain any convictions of major political figures while he was the General Prosecutor of the Ukraine. No oligarchs, no bureaucrats, nobody. The investigation into Burisma Holdings had gone dormant at the time that Shokin was fired. Shokin wasn't prosecuting corruption, he was a party to it. The entire European Union wanted him fired. So, your snide remark is correct. As inconvenient as it is for the lazy Republican narrative - there is indeed, nothing to see there.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top