Literally nothing changed. Last week, I used the example of winning a judgment against a former tenant but never saw a dime. This is the political equivalent.
Rand Pauls complaints about "selectedwitnesses" is odd. The Trump allies in the White House who were subpoenaed, refused to appear before the House. The witnesses who did appear were all highly relevant to the proceedings, especially the two United States Ambassadors to the Ukraine (Marie Yovanovitch and William Taylor), Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman (who was on the July 25th phone call) and Gordon Sondland (a Trump appointee who is the United States Ambassador to the European Union). Not all of the witnesses gave testimony damaging to Trump (such as Kurt Volker).
That is a lame defense. If the Trump Administration feels the witnesses were unbalanced against them, they could have allowed others such as John Bolton and Mike Pompeo to testify. They didn't want that.
If a blind person says, "I saw today" nothing need follow.
If a quadriplegic says, "I walked today" nothing need follow.
The statement, "Trump was impeached today" needs no follow up,
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.