The Impeachment Thread

#25,431
#25,431
GAVol said:
You’re totally missing my point.

I couldn’t care less about the lack of class. I’m saying it was dumb to make the joke because it undermines whatever else she was saying. She made it way too easy for the right to put her in a box.
Click to expand...

Ahh fair point. I see your angle now.
 
#25,432
#25,432
hjeagle1vol said:
and a liar under oath apparently. It just keeps getting better for the clown show.

Click to expand...


A lawyer that lies under oath calling out a politician for lying , In a trial that’s fighting for public opinion and votes
. You guys really should find better witnesses or this will all be a giant laughable side show leading up to 2020. Don’t think for a second Trump isn’t going to use all of it on the trail pointing out each and every one of these things .
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol, tennvols77 and VolnJC
#25,438
#25,438
BowlBrother85 said:
How does requesting a public statement from Zelensky on opening an investigation of the Bidens have anything to do with looking into the 2016 election? Trump wanted to politically damage a potential future opponent of his. To pretend that the point of this involved anything else, is playing dumb.
Click to expand...
Call it what you want but Trump has alluded to the 2016 election and general corruption. The Dems have the burden of proof and they are failing. To pretend otherwise is to play dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
#25,439
#25,439
BowlBrother85 said:
I mean, seriously, all the mean and personal crap that Trump throws around... but they want to make an issue out of that? Jeez. They are so accustomed to Democrats taking the high road that they don't know what to think when one of them gets on Trump's level. And that was nothing.
Click to expand...
We certainly aren’t used to any high roads taken on here.
 
#25,441
#25,441
I love how articles in the MSM claim that bribery need not meet the legal definition to impeach Trump but then turn around and cry that Trump’s blocking of witnesses is “lawless”. You can’t have it both ways. Either this is a legal matter or it isn’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol and tennvols77
#25,447
#25,447
PointGuard said:
Only those on the right see her comment as an attack on Barron. She is signifying that Trump naming him Barron (as he originally wanted to name Jr.) signals his view of a Monarchy and doing as you please as opposed to elected official status and a need for conforming to the rule of law
Click to expand...
Unshun. That’s a stupid point. Reshun.
 
#25,449
#25,449
BowlBrother85 said:
She has no credibility. She never speaks up about any of the anger and hate her husband spews or the biased public pandering that her husband does.
Click to expand...
By that logic then a lot of people on here don’t have any credibility either (LG, PG, EL, I think you see the pattern).
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top