GVF
Talk Dirty To Me
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2004
- Messages
- 14,549
- Likes
- 13,063
My thoughts too. Leave bogus info like a retired IP address... From fancy bear(APT29) and call it good...no, but they all point to that as evidence. It's evidence of a frame job.The malware was compiled after Crowdstrike started installing software on the servers, and the compiled malware contained two year old IOCs that had been retired by the "Russian" hackers two years earlier. Oh, and the only reason that malware and those IOCs were "known" to be Russian hackers' was that they had been attributed to them during an earlier compromise.
I could write a YARA rule in literally less than 30 seconds that would look for C2 traffic to that IP address. However, I would never waste the time because that IOC would be a part of EVERY IOC intel subscription in existence. In other words, every network of worth would be notifying on outgoing traffic to that IP address, that the network had been hacked.
A script kiddy wouldn't make that mistake, much less an APT. It's like finding Homer Simpson's driver's license at the scene of a museum art burglary and thus attributing the burglary to Homer Simpson. It's just not a mistake the cat burglar would make unless he was trying to frame Homer.
I'm sensing deja vu in 2020 with the Democratic candidates offered.And he won because his opponent was Hillary.
You blame Trump solely on the right. What others point out to you is the left didn't do a very good job opposing him by running Hillary. It's a case of both sides are to blame. But your narrow mind doesn't want to acknowledge that your side screwed up. Nope, has to be someone else's fault. A set of events led to Trump becoming POTUS. The GOP is to blame for Trump being their nominee. The Dems are to blame for choosing Hillary as their nominee. The voting public is to blame for Trump becoming President. Everyone has a part of the blame, so continuing to assign it to on side is stupid. I still believe if the Dems had run someone other than Hillary, they most likely would have won in 2016. But for whatever reason, they still refuse to own that.
It's actually more than that. It appears that an old version of known malware was recycled/installed to point the finger at a certain group. To relate this to a physical forensic investigation, it'd be likened to taking the glove from OJ's trial out of evidence, dropping it at the scene of a murder, and saying that it proves OJ murdered again.My thoughts too. Leave bogus info like a retired IP address... From fancy bear(APT29) and call it good...no, but they all point to that as evidence. It's evidence of a frame job.
That is a great analogy. Maybe I'm jaded but i don't accept crowdstrike or the fbi as working in America's best interest in this. They have a clear agenda.It's actually more than that. It appears that an old version of known malware was recycled/installed to point the finger at a certain group. To relate this to a physical forensic investigation, it'd be likened to taking the glove from OJ's trial out of evidence, dropping it at the scene of a murder, and saying that it proves OJ murdered again.
The analyst that fingered Russia had just left the Intel community, gone to work at Crowdstrike, and been called in to investigate the DNC "hack". He admittedly worked almost completely alone on the DNC investigation. And, for all the investigations into Russian collusion, hacking, etc, he's never once been asked to interview with the 3 letter agencies, much less been put under oath.That is a great analogy. Maybe I'm jaded but i don't accept crowdstrike or the fbi as working in America's best interest in this. They have a clear agenda.
This. It's been out there for a long time. People built investigations on the fact the DNC was hacked by Russians. They have stated it over and over ad nauseum as if it's fact. It's definitely not.The analyst that fingered Russia had just left the Intel community, gone to work at Crowdstrike, and been called in to investigate the DNC "hack". He admittedly worked almost completely alone on the DNC investigation. And, for all the investigations into Russian collusion, hacking, etc, he's never once been asked to interview with the 3 letter agencies, much less been put under oath.
Think about that for a second.
In comparison, the most famous malware hack in history is stuxnet, from 2010, attributed with damaging Iran nuclear equipment. Though there is suspicion as to who did it, it's still never been proven. That's nine years.This. It's been out there for a long time. People built investigations on the fact the DNC was hacked by Russians. They have stated it over and over ad nauseum as if it's fact. It's definitely not.
How bout you do that. I don’t need to. Enjoying the holiday
link?The analyst that fingered Russia had just left the Intel community, gone to work at Crowdstrike, and been called in to investigate the DNC "hack". He admittedly worked almost completely alone on the DNC investigation. And, for all the investigations into Russian collusion, hacking, etc, he's never once been asked to interview with the 3 letter agencies, much less been put under oath.
Think about that for a second.
At 30, Johnston was already an accomplished digital detective who had just left the military’s elite Cyber Command, where he had helped stanch a Russian hack on the US military’s top leadership. Now, working for a private cybersecurity company, he had to brief the DNC — while it was in the middle of a white-knuckle presidential campaign — about what he’d found in the organization’s computer networks
Despite his central role, Johnston has never talked with investigators probing Russian interference, let alone with the media. But to people dealing with the crisis, “He was indispensable,” as a source close to the DNC put it.
Johnston was also largely on his own. The party had hired CrowdStrike essentially in place of the FBI — to this day, the Bureau has not had access to the DNC’s servers.
Robert Johnston maybe?It's all in a buzzfeed article from shortly after the incident. Feel free to Google buzzfeed and Brian Johnston.
Yeah you’re gonna need to actually link his profile in your reply or his raging meandering ass will rage right on by your post while he keeps demanding you provide a link.https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...he-dnc-hack-now-hes-telling-his-story-for-the
There you go, champ. Not that you deserved a response, considering how you conduct yourself around here.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...he-dnc-hack-now-hes-telling-his-story-for-the
There you go, champ. Not that you deserved a response, considering how you conduct yourself around here.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...he-dnc-hack-now-hes-telling-his-story-for-the
There you go, champ. Not that you deserved a response, considering how you conduct yourself around here.
Think it's giving me a 404, not found.Let me have your thoughts on this one
https://www.salon.com/2019/11/19/trumps-still-pushing-the-crowdstrike
Let me have your thoughts on this one
https://www.salon.com/2019/11/19/trumps-still-pushing-the-crowdstrike-theory-but-why-and-where-did-it-come-from/