The Impeachment Thread

Well, then, post up some quotes, Brainiac.

The general catchall, "it was on TV", is just deflective BS, but that's all you're good for anyway. Go ahead, prove me wrong.

It was all the testimony at the hearings. You know those events where Devin Nunes used his minutes of questioning witnesses to recite all those previously debunked ultra right wing conspiracy theories and Gym Jordan used his questioning time to testify as to his wrong/irrelevant theories as to why those who were actually testifying were wrong without citing any evidence he was right

All the testimony that Fox News declared to be wrong and all the dumb fuggers here use as their basis of denial of all facts

Sondland
 
It was all the testimony at the hearings. You know those events where Devin Nunes used his minutes of questioning witnesses to recite all those previously debunked ultra right wing conspiracy theories and Gym Jordan used his questioning time to testify as to his wrong/irrelevant theories as to why those who were actually testifying

All the testimony that Fox News declared to be wrk g and all the dumb fuggers here use as their basis of denial

I will repeat myself: Post up some quotes. Post up some specific testimony. I did it for you regarding Sondland's testimony. Did you read it or was it just "tl,dr" for you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
Listen to something besides Fox No-News every once in a while. Get enlightened with facts. Dr. Hill , Sondland “correcting” his lying self

You and your liker (GOD II) are Russian Bots?
Assume much? I don’t listen to any of the news outlets much but when I do I actually like to bounce around to hear what all sides are saying. Novel concept, I know. I’m not Russian, haven’t ever been to Russia, and I think I’ve only ever drank one White Russian. I’m glad you agree that the only direct witness you have isn’t credible though. Everything else is literally hearsay and conjecture now that you’ve accepted Sondland’s testimony isn’t credible.
 
There are many reasons Trump won the Electoral College, one of which was 10+ years of demonizing Hillary. There's documented proof in this forum. People did seem to vote against something rather than for something.
That’s what happens when you get a two-party system throwing up 2 crappy candidates. Unfortunately, I’d say most people that voted were in the boat of voting against something as opposed to voting for something and that applies regardless of which side of the aisle you sit on.
 
Assume much? I don’t listen to any of the news outlets much but when I do I actually like to bounce around to hear what all sides are saying. Novel concept, I know. I’m not Russian, haven’t ever been to Russia, and I think I’ve only ever drank one White Russian. I’m glad you agree that the only direct witness you have isn’t credible though. Everything else is literally hearsay and conjecture now that you’ve accepted Sondland’s testimony isn’t credible.

Sure Sondland’s cell phone call with Trump and his statements as to what Trump wanted - pure hearsay. Polite term Russian bot
 
Sure Sondland’s cell phone call with Trump and his statements as to what Trump wanted - pure hearsay. Polite term Russian bot
Are you talking about the one that Holmes supposedly heard despite sitting at a restaurant that undoubtedly wasn’t perfectly quiet? Even with quiet CNN demonstrated how well peripheral people hear the person on the other end of a phone call. Did you see that demonstration? If not look it up as it is hilarious no matter what side you’re on. It’s like on QVC when some technology they’re trying to demo doesn’t work. Anyway, that is absolutely in the conjecture category because it is quite improbable that Holmes clearly heard everything Trump said. Even if he did, it still comes back to Trump saying he interested in 2016 corruption so Dems will never be able to prove he is trying to investigate Biden for personal gain.
 
I watched all the hearing (recorded or live) and the testimony that got me was (quoting the New Yorker) Taylor made clear the very real stakes of the political and security situation in Ukraine, noting that lives were lost in the current conflict while Giuliani and others allegedly used security assistance as a bargaining chip

Now, you can say that Trump didn't ask Zelensky to look into the Biden's on the "perfect" phone call or talk to Rudy, but he DID say that.

All the testimony linked together-- For example, when Taylor's aid said he heard the President's phone call in a restaurant from Sondland's phone, Sondland verified it. While Sondland said Trump wouldn't mention the aid but only the meeting, he assumed it was aid, too.

BUT in a press conference, Mulvaney said they held up the aid to Ukraine because of investigations, told everyone to get over it, and then retracted when the oven got too hot.

Fiona Hill gave us a clear idea about how screwed up Bolton thought it all was.

Pence's secretary and Colonel Vindman were both on the call and said it was unusual and alarming.

Several had talked to Zelensky about not getting involved in the middle of American politics and he agreed, but still felt he had to go on CNN and say he was investigating the Biden's. (CNN verified there was an interview) When the aid was released, the interview was cancelled (The meeting at the White house never happened) .

We can stick our head in the sand or use our common sense--unless you thought Casey Anthony and OJ were innocent, then I can't help you.

If people died (or even may have) because of a conspiracy theory due to his paranoia that Biden (Obama's VP) was beating him in the polls, then he deserves to be impeached, regardless of party affiliation. We do not want to set that precedence.
 
Are you talking about the one that Holmes supposedly heard despite sitting at a restaurant that undoubtedly wasn’t perfectly quiet? Even with quiet CNN demonstrated how well peripheral people hear the person on the other end of a phone call. Did you see that demonstration? If not look it up as it is hilarious no matter what side you’re on. It’s like on QVC when some technology they’re trying to demo doesn’t work. Anyway, that is absolutely in the conjecture category because it is quite improbable that Holmes clearly heard everything Trump said. Even if he did, it still comes back to Trump saying he interested in 2016 corruption so Dems will never be able to prove he is trying to investigate Biden for personal gain.

If your rebuttal to facts of Sondland’s testimony, Faith Bill’s testimony and all the rest is some CNN/QVC demonstration then it is pointless to have a conversation. It’s really pointless anyway you Russian bots have your mind made up no matter the facts
 
I watched all the hearing (recorded or live) and the testimony that got me was (quoting the New Yorker) Taylor made clear the very real stakes of the political and security situation in Ukraine, noting that lives were lost in the current conflict while Giuliani and others allegedly used security assistance as a bargaining chip

Now, you can say that Trump didn't ask Zelensky to look into the Biden's on the "perfect" phone call or talk to Rudy, but he DID say that.

All the testimony linked together-- For example, when Taylor's aid said he heard the President's phone call in a restaurant from Sondland's phone, Sondland verified it. While Sondland said Trump wouldn't mention the aid but only the meeting, he assumed it was aid, too.

BUT in a press conference, Mulvaney said they held up the aid to Ukraine because of investigations, told everyone to get over it, and then retracted when the oven got too hot.

Fiona Hill gave us a clear idea about how screwed up Bolton thought it all was.

Pence's secretary and Colonel Vindman were both on the call and said it was unusual and alarming.

Several had talked to Zelensky about not getting involved in the middle of American politics and he agreed, but still felt he had to go on CNN and say he was investigating the Biden's. (CNN verified there was an interview) When the aid was released, the interview was cancelled (The meeting at the White house never happened) .

We can stick our head in the sand or use our common sense--unless you thought Casey Anthony and OJ were innocent, then I can't help you.

If people died (or even may have) because of a conspiracy theory due to his paranoia that Biden (Obama's VP) was beating him in the polls, then he deserves to be impeached, regardless of party affiliation. We do not want to set that precedence.
Speaking of Fiona Hill
 
Sure Sondland’s cell phone call with Trump and his statements as to what Trump wanted - pure hearsay. Polite term Russian bot
iu
 
If your rebuttal to facts of Sondland’s testimony, Faith Bill’s testimony and all the rest is some CNN/QVC demonstration then it is pointless to have a conversation. It’s really pointless anyway you Russian bots have your mind made up no matter the facts
iu
 
If your rebuttal to facts of Sondland’s testimony, Faith Bill’s testimony and all the rest is some CNN/QVC demonstration then it is pointless to have a conversation. It’s really pointless anyway you Russian bots have your mind made up no matter the facts
You can’t read can you? I never said that hilarious demonstration of stupidity rebuked all their testimony but it proved what should be common sense to anyone and that is that there’s no way Holmes heard everything Trump said. Clearly you are hell bent on demonstrating your own stupidity despite the attempts of discussion. It seems to me your mind was made up before the first shred of “evidence” was shown but then again what more would I expect from someone who has nothing of substance and calls everyone with which he disagrees a Russian bot. I guess you’re just a Ukrainian bot since they meddled in the 2016 election against Trump.
 
You can’t read can you? I never said that hilarious demonstration of stupidity rebuked all their testimony but it proved what should be common sense to anyone and that is that there’s no way Holmes heard everything Trump said. Clearly you are hell bent on demonstrating your own stupidity despite the attempts of discussion. It seems to me your mind was made up before the first shred of “evidence” was shown but then again what more would I expect from someone who has nothing of substance and calls everyone with which he disagrees a Russian bot. I guess you’re just a Ukrainian bot since they meddled in the 2016 election against Trump.
I take you have never been in a car and overheard the entire conversation of a passenger.
tumblr_o183eg7Okh1tjydheo3_500.gifv
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rifleman
Bad deflection. Watch and learn from others. Amateur
You still haven't posted anything, have you?

One wonders why. No not really. One knows why.

If it was so easy and pervasive, you would jump at the chance. So I guess it is either you've got nothing, or you are too lazy or incompetent to do so.
 
[VIDEO=]
You still haven't posted anything, have you?

One wonders why. No not really. One knows why.

If it was so easy and pervasive, you would jump at the chance. So I guess it is either you've got nothing, or you are too lazy or incompetent to do so.
the latter
 
Well, then, post up some quotes, Brainiac.

The general catchall, "it was on TV", is just deflective BS, but that's all you're good for anyway. Go ahead, prove me wrong.
I forgot about Brainiac. I guess he came back as one of the other loonies on here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01
Advertisement

Back
Top