volfanhill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 38,377
- Likes
- 71,585
This thread is all over the place today. Apparently Trump, Hillary, Obama, and *insert Democrat name here* are all going to jail.
Not gonna lie, this crap is getting old. They are guilty, no those other guys are guilty, no it was a unicorn! Then the Q stuff starts, and it gets weirder than the unicorn.
After decades of investigations, Hillary is out and about. There's nothing there. There will be nothing there. Stop. Hate her all you want, if the GOP hasn't been able to nail her by now, it isn't going to happen. Just stop.
As far as the impeach inquiry goes, there needs to be more. I have no doubt Trump is a shady bastard that broke every law in the book to get to his position today. He's probably committing a felony right now. But if we are going to go down this road of impeachment, the proof needs to be overwhelming and undeniable. I'm not sure we've reached that point yet.
This thread is all over the place today. Apparently Trump, Hillary, Obama, and *insert Democrat name here* are all going to jail.
Not gonna lie, this crap is getting old. They are guilty, no those other guys are guilty, no it was a unicorn! Then the Q stuff starts, and it gets weirder than the unicorn.
After decades of investigations, Hillary is out and about. There's nothing there. There will be nothing there. Stop. Hate her all you want, if the GOP hasn't been able to nail her by now, it isn't going to happen. Just stop.
As far as the impeach inquiry goes, there needs to be more. I have no doubt Trump is a shady bastard that broke every law in the book to get to his position today. He's probably committing a felony right now. But if we are going to go down this road of impeachment, the proof needs to be overwhelming and undeniable. I'm not sure we've reached that point yet.
I was more speaking about aggravation with this thread. How long did the Clinton impeachment stuff last? I think this has been way short of that. But people do lose attention quickly now. It is a product of the 24/7 news cycle and twitter sphere.This is what I was referring to earlier ... no matter which party it is , no matter who’s on the hook , they have to put them away PDQ or people get fed up hearing about it 24/7 and move on . I’m betting most Americans that did start out interested is at this point now .
It’s my fault. I like to derail threads when things get too heated sometimes. I do the same thing in real life.Sorry for things getting sidetracked thread people. I didn't bring Pete up, in my defense. Back to regularly scheduled arguing. Anyone thing McGhan and Bolton will have to testify after today's ruling and all the appeals run out?
This was a good thread to do it in earlier. It was getting rather feisty today.It’s my fault. I like to derail threads when things get too heated sometimes. I do the same thing in real life.
I don’t like confrontation, I prefer civil discourse.
“Forensicators first decisive findings, made public in the paper dated July 9, concerned the volume of the supposedly hacked material and what is called the transfer rate—the time a remote hack would require. The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.
These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory. No Internet service provider, such as a hacker would have had to use in mid-2016, was capable of downloading data at this speed. Compounding this contradiction, Guccifer claimed to have run his hack from Romania, which, for numerous reasons technically called delivery overheads, would slow down the speed of a hack even further from maximum achievable speeds.”
Time stamps in the metadata indicate the download occurred somewhere on the East Coast of the United States—not Russia, Romania, or anywhere else outside the EDT zone.