volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,634
- Likes
- 23,597
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's ruling: "Stated simply, the primary takeaway from the past 250 years of recorded American history is that Presidents are not kings ... This means that they do not have subjects, bound by loyalty or blood, whose destiny they are entitled to control."
Can you link?@Orange_Crush
This will ignore anything that falls under the umbrella of being simply "an influence campaign" such as facebook memes and fake news and so forth. This includes the evidence contained in the ODNI's (Office of the Director of National Intelligence) declassified assessment of "Russian activities and intentions in recent U.S. elections"..
- Computer hackers affiliated with the Russian military intelligence service (GRU) infiltrated information systems of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Clinton Campaign officials, notably Chairman John Podesta, and publicly released stolen files and emails through DCLeaks, Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks during the election campaign.
- The GRU hacked into "the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC)". As a result, the GRU obtained hundreds of thousands of hacked documents, and the GRU proceeded by arranging releases of damaging hacked material via the WikiLeaks organization and also, GRU's personas "DCLeaks" and "Guccifer 2.0".
- The GRU using the names "Cozy Bear" and "Fancy Bear" gained access to the computer network of the Democratic National Committee in July of 2015 and maintained it until June of 2016, when they began leaking the stolen information via the Guccifer 2.0 online persona.
- In June and July of 2016, cybersecurity experts and firms, including CrowdStrike, Fidelis, FireEye, Mandiant, SecureWorks and Symantec all stated that the DNC hacks were part of a series of cyberattacks on the DNC committed by Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear.
- During the summer and fall of 2016, Russian hackers intruded into voter databases and software systems in 39 different states, alarming Obama administration officials to the point that they took the unprecedented step of contacting Moscow directly via the Moscow/Washington hotline and warning that the attacks could risk setting off a broader conflict.
- In September of 2016, US Department of Homeland Security officials and the National Association of Secretaries of State announced that hackers had penetrated or sought to penetrate, the voter registration systems in more than 20 states over the previous few months. Federal investigators attributed these attempts to Russian government sponsored hackers and more specifically Russian intelligence agencies. Four of the intrusions into voter registration databases were successful, including intrusions into the Illinois and Arizona databases, although the hackers did not appear to change or manipulate any data. Illinois officials stated that information on up to 200,000 registered voters was stolen.
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's ruling: "Stated simply, the primary takeaway from the past 250 years of recorded American history is that Presidents are not kings ... This means that they do not have subjects, bound by loyalty or blood, whose destiny they are entitled to control."
If any member of the House (R or D) believes the evidence that the President abused his power is compelling and do not vote to impeach they should resign or be removed for failing to uphold their oath of office.If this is true, I called this a long time ago. About as soon as they announced the impeachment hearings. I said that Nancy was too savvy to go down that rabbit hole to the bottom.
That is from the Office of the DNI assessment... The Senate Intel Report says virtually the same thing. The most likely conclusion is that you are determined to believe whatever you think benefits Trump's position and posting anything else in response would be a waste of time. If you want to think that our entire intelligence apparatus is lying to us (including the GOP controlled Senate Intel Committee).... that is your concern, not mine.I'm your huckleberry.
Dazzle me with your brilliance. I'll go toe to toe. I'd say that I probably have 10x the training, expertise and cetification in DFIR that you do, except I suspect I'll be multiplying by zero. So, that wouldn't work.
Can you link?
We'll take it from there.
I warn you. I know DFIR intimately. The fact that they claim that they know who did it because they left breadcrumbs indicates that they don't know how nation state APTs work.
If our Intelligence organizations don't know how nations state APTs work, we are in trouble.
I've gone through the training with our intelligence DFIR investigators and currently work on teams with former intelligence agency investigators.. They know how nation state APTs work.
The most likely conclusion is that we are being lied to.
I think they will. Roberts may give us some witnesses we haven't been able to hear from.I hope they keep up the charade. It’s basically a Trump Pence 2020 campaign contribution.
I think they will. Roberts may give us some witnesses we haven't been able to hear from.
Each passing week makes Trump luck guiltier and guiltier.
Not that the 36 percenters are about to open their eyes. But the other 64%.....
You know what? This isn't worth giving out any more information about myself.That is from the Office of the DNI assessment... The Senate Intel Report says virtually the same thing. The most likely conclusion is that you are determined to believe whatever you think benefits Trump's position and posting anything else in response would be a waste of time. If you want to think that our entire intelligence apparatus is lying to us (including the GOP controlled Senate).... that is your concern, not mine.
That's not partisan. She is observing the difference between a democratic republic and a monarchy.
Let’s revisit this post after he’s re-elected shall we?This thread is all over the place today. Apparently Trump, Hillary, Obama, and *insert Democrat name here* are all going to jail.
Not gonna lie, this crap is getting old. They are guilty, no those other guys are guilty, no it was a unicorn! Then the Q stuff starts, and it gets weirder than the unicorn.
After decades of investigations, Hillary is out and about. There's nothing there. There will be nothing there. Stop. Hate her all you want, if the GOP hasn't been able to nail her by now, it isn't going to happen. Just stop.
As far as the impeach inquiry goes, there needs to be more. I have no doubt Trump is a shady bastard that broke every law in the book to get to his position today. He's probably committing a felony right now. But if we are going to go down this road of impeachment, the proof needs to be overwhelming and undeniable. I'm not sure we've reached that point yet.
So stop looking into the Clintons and democrats but keep on with the impeachment hearings. lolThis thread is all over the place today. Apparently Trump, Hillary, Obama, and *insert Democrat name here* are all going to jail.
Not gonna lie, this crap is getting old. They are guilty, no those other guys are guilty, no it was a unicorn! Then the Q stuff starts, and it gets weirder than the unicorn.
After decades of investigations, Hillary is out and about. There's nothing there. There will be nothing there. Stop. Hate her all you want, if the GOP hasn't been able to nail her by now, it isn't going to happen. Just stop.
As far as the impeach inquiry goes, there needs to be more. I have no doubt Trump is a shady bastard that broke every law in the book to get to his position today. He's probably committing a felony right now. But if we are going to go down this road of impeachment, the proof needs to be overwhelming and undeniable. I'm not sure we've reached that point yet.