The Impeachment Thread

[SpaceCoastVol]

....and she hasn't gotten over that crushing defeat......she still cries everyday just like most Dims we all know.

I have little doubt

 

[Mick]

Of course that it was Assange is going to say. There is plenty of evidence which has been provided online by our intelligence community that Russia did hack both the DNC and voter registration database systems. The entire intelligence apparatus from the USA has concluded this as well as the Senate Intel Committee. This is what I was talking about when I said that the Republican Party has become the party of Russian sympathizers and conspiracy theorists.

It's amazing someone that hangs out in the Epstein Q pedo threads is in here citing Assange as a credible source in defense of Trump. .

 

[BowlBrother85]

Only people that say they know for sure are the DNC and Crowdstrike. All they had to do was turn the servers over to the FBI, why did the never turn them over?

They did. The DNC de-commissioned over 100 servers all of which had a digital image that was given to the FBI. The entire intelligence apparatus of the United States has concluded that Russia not only hacked the DNC but also hacked voter registration database systems.

Do you understand that you are reciting talking points from a Russian disinformation campaign?

 

[RockyTop85]

No joke, this is the first sentence from the "news article":

"A few caveats before we get to the unmistakable polling trend against impeachment: First, many of the data points highlighted below were gathered before last week's testimony, so public sentiment could shift back in a pro-impeachment direction once the impact of testimony from the last few witnesses -- Amb. Gordon Sondland in particular -- gets baked into the numbers."

Didn’t read the article but fwiw, there’s not a single poll on RCP that reflects Sondland’s testimony. The newest poll on there concluded 11/19 and Sondland testified on 11/20.

I think there’s been some smaller polls run since then but none of the 35 or so on RCP are post hearings.

 

[volfanjustin]

They did. The DNC de-commissioned over 100 servers all of which had a digital image that was given to the FBI. The entire intelligence apparatus of the United States has concluded that Russia not only hacked the DNC but also hacked voter registration database systems.

Do you understand that you are reciting talking points from a Russian disinformation campaign?

Just accept you all lost fair and square try to get a sane person to run, nominate them and get them elected. 3 years later and the crazy left just can’t accept the results of the election

 

[BowlBrother85]

Just accept you all lost fair and square try to get a sane person to run, nominate them and get them elected. 3 years later and the crazy left just can’t accept the results of the election

Just stop reciting conspiracy theories with allegations lifted directly from Russian propaganda. I have long since accepted that Trump defeated Hillary Clinton fair and square.

 

[volfanjustin]

Just stop reciting conspiracy theories with allegations lifted directly from Russian propaganda. I have long since accepted that Trump defeated Hillary Clinton fair and square.

Haha. Just because it’s not what CNN tells you doesn’t mean it’s some Russian propaganda. Your boy Barry was far more cozy with the Russians than President Trump is

 

[1972 Grad]

If this is true, I called this a long time ago. About as soon as they announced the impeachment hearings. I said that Nancy was too savvy to go down that rabbit hole to the bottom.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Only people that say they know for sure are the DNC and Crowdstrike. All they had to do was turn the servers over to the FBI, why did the never turn them over?

And Assange, who has blatantly said repeatedly that it wasn't Russia. BB has no evidence. He has claims from Mueller and a disgraced three letter agency that's under federal investigation. When there was opportunity to give actual "evidence" Mueller petitioned the court not to make him produce any.

Of course that it was Assange is going to say. There is plenty of evidence which has been provided online by our intelligence community that Russia did hack both the DNC and voter registration database systems. The entire intelligence apparatus from the USA has concluded this as well as the Senate Intel Committee. This is what I was talking about when I said that the Republican Party has become the party of Russian sympathizers and conspiracy theorists.

I'd appreciate you posting that evidence, and those quotes from "the entire intelligence apparatus". Literally, all I have ever seen from "the entire intelligence apparatus" has been claims that Russia pushed a narrative. Period.

Mueller claimed that Russia hacked the servers. He indicted Russians, then when they pressed him to present his evidence, he begged not to have to. I've seen the FBI claim it, but then...the FBI has ZERO credibility. Period.

What you have is he said/she said. That's not evidence.

The disgust you speak of is misplaced. This isn't about being Russian sympathizers. It's about a complete distrust for the parts of the US government that have been proving themselves untrustworthy. From the CIA doing illegal tests on American citizens from the 1950s to the current FBI that literally defrauded evidence to frame a political foe...

Your disgust should be pointed at the government that is supposed to be serving you,

 

[BowlBrother85]

Haha. Just because it’s not what CNN tells you doesn’t mean it’s some Russian propaganda. Your boy Barry was far more cozy with the Russians than President Trump is

Our intelligence community has identified your theory as being a talking point lifted directly from Russian disinformation. And your last line is patently ridiculous.

 

[BowlBrother85]

And Assange, who has blatantly said repeatedly that it wasn't Russia. BB has no evidence. He has claims from Mueller and a disgraced three letter agency that's under federal investigation. When there was opportunity to give actual "evidence" Mueller petitioned the court not to make him produce any.

I'd appreciate you posting that evidence, and those quotes from "the entire intelligence apparatus". Literally, all I have ever seen from "the entire intelligence apparatus" has been claims that Russia pushed a narrative. Period.

Mueller claimed that Russia hacked the servers. He indicted Russians, then when they pressed him to present his evidence, he begged not to have to. I've seen the FBI claim it, but then...the FBI has ZERO credibility. Period.

What you have is he said/she said. That's not evidence.

The disgust you speak of is misplaced. This isn't about being Russian sympathizers. It's about a complete distrust for the parts of the US government that have been proving themselves untrustworthy. From the CIA doing illegal tests on American citizens from the 1950s to the current FBI that literally defrauded evidence to frame a political foe...

Your disgust should be pointed at the government that is supposed to be serving you,

I will post evidence later... it takes some time to compile (though it is easily available on Google with simple searches) and I have done it many times on here in the past but just for you... I will again. Having dinner now. Will be back around 9.

 

[Mick]

Just stop reciting conspiracy theories with allegations lifted directly from Russian propaganda. I have long since accepted that Trump defeated Hillary Clinton fair and square.

It's the morally bankrupt supporters that's hard to accept. It's easy to accept there are some Deep Red states and it was Hillary. Even then it required the body count, email, Benghazi and Uranium one conspiracies.

 

[Orangeburst]

If this is true, I called this a long time ago. About as soon as they announced the impeachment hearings. I said that Nancy was too savvy to go down that rabbit hole to the bottom.

I thought our democracy was at stake? Are Pelosi and Schiff unpatriotic?

 

[volfanjustin]

Our intelligence community has identified your theory as being a talking point lifted directly from Russian disinformation. And your last line is patently ridiculous.

FBI never got the servers that’s a fact. “The 1980s call they want their foreign policy back”

 

[BowlBrother85]

FBI never got the servers that’s a fact. “The 1980s call they want their foreign policy back”

They didn't need to take the same physical servers with them. Did you read my previous post? That is not how it works. The FBI took the digital image of over 100 servers which were then de-commissioned by the DNC. The FBI got what they needed.

 

[Mick]

FBI never got the servers that’s a fact. “The 1980s call they want their foreign policy back”

It's obvious you wouldn't have the slightest clue what you were looking for or how to find it. Your post is proof.. So let me ask what information does the FBI not posses that you fine imperative to your screeching.

 

[Girth Brooks]

And Assange, who has blatantly said repeatedly that it wasn't Russia. BB has no evidence. He has claims from Mueller and a disgraced three letter agency that's under federal investigation. When there was opportunity to give actual "evidence" Mueller petitioned the court not to make him produce any.

I'd appreciate you posting that evidence, and those quotes from "the entire intelligence apparatus". Literally, all I have ever seen from "the entire intelligence apparatus" has been claims that Russia pushed a narrative. Period.

Mueller claimed that Russia hacked the servers. He indicted Russians, then when they pressed him to present his evidence, he begged not to have to. I've seen the FBI claim it, but then...the FBI has ZERO credibility. Period.

What you have is he said/she said. That's not evidence.

The disgust you speak of is misplaced. This isn't about being Russian sympathizers. It's about a complete distrust for the parts of the US government that have been proving themselves untrustworthy. From the CIA doing illegal tests on American citizens from the 1950s to the current FBI that literally defrauded evidence to frame a political foe...

Your disgust should be pointed at the government that is supposed to be serving you,

He is too myopic to see that unelected, self-serving bureaucrats would be patently dishonest about a man who’s a threat to their very existence (think JFK here). For the life of me, I don’t understand how some of you have the want and endurance to go around in circles with these mouth breathing wind bags. If they were ignored, it’d be a leftist circle jerk, with abounding blue balls. Now that would be a sight to behold—just like the reality of their sex lives, they’ll happily walk with an awkward gait, sporting a chub they got from dry humping.

There’s not a one here that I’d soberly and honestly engage. Not. One. They are miserable and should be given meme bombs, if you’re going to “engage” them, just like I’ve alluded to before. No sense in wasting a well-composed comment when a well-placed picture is worth more.

 

[hjeagle1vol]

He is too myopic to see that unelected, self-serving bureaucrats would be patently dishonest about a man who’s a threat to their very existence (think JFK here). For the life of me, I don’t understand how some of you have the want and endurance to go around in circles with these mouth breathing wind bags. If they were ignored, it’d be a leftist circle jerk, with abounding blue balls. Now that would be a sight to behold—just like the reality of their sex lives, they’ll happily walk with an awkward gait, sporting a chub they got from dry humping.

There’s not a one here that I’d soberly and honestly engage. Not. One. They are miserable and should be given meme bombs, if you’re going to “engage” them, just like I’ve alluded to before. No sense in wasting a well-composed comment when a well-placed picture is worth more.

 

[BowlBrother85]

@Orange_Crush

This will ignore anything that falls under the umbrella of being simply "an influence campaign" such as facebook memes and fake news and so forth. This includes the evidence contained in the ODNI's (Office of the Director of National Intelligence) declassified assessment of "Russian activities and intentions in recent U.S. elections"..

• Computer hackers affiliated with the Russian military intelligence service (GRU) infiltrated information systems of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Clinton Campaign officials, notably Chairman John Podesta, and publicly released stolen files and emails through DCLeaks, Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks during the election campaign.
• The GRU hacked into "the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC)". As a result, the GRU obtained hundreds of thousands of hacked documents, and the GRU proceeded by arranging releases of damaging hacked material via the WikiLeaks organization and also, GRU's personas "DCLeaks" and "Guccifer 2.0".
• The GRU using the names "Cozy Bear" and "Fancy Bear" gained access to the computer network of the Democratic National Committee in July of 2015 and maintained it until June of 2016, when they began leaking the stolen information via the Guccifer 2.0 online persona.
• In June and July of 2016, cybersecurity experts and firms, including CrowdStrike, Fidelis, FireEye, Mandiant, SecureWorks and Symantec all stated that the DNC hacks were part of a series of cyberattacks on the DNC committed by Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear.
• During the summer and fall of 2016, Russian hackers intruded into voter databases and software systems in 39 different states, alarming Obama administration officials to the point that they took the unprecedented step of contacting Moscow directly via the Moscow/Washington hotline and warning that the attacks could risk setting off a broader conflict.
• In September of 2016, US Department of Homeland Security officials and the National Association of Secretaries of State announced that hackers had penetrated or sought to penetrate, the voter registration systems in more than 20 states over the previous few months. Federal investigators attributed these attempts to Russian government sponsored hackers and more specifically Russian intelligence agencies. Four of the intrusions into voter registration databases were successful, including intrusions into the Illinois and Arizona databases, although the hackers did not appear to change or manipulate any data. Illinois officials stated that information on up to 200,000 registered voters was stolen.

 

[luthervol]

If this is true, I called this a long time ago. About as soon as they announced the impeachment hearings. I said that Nancy was too savvy to go down that rabbit hole to the bottom.

I say they impeach....I certainly hope they do.
If I'm wrong, I'll come on here and admit that once again I was wrong.
If they do impeach and you are wrong, you do the same.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

 

[Orange_Crush]

It's obvious you wouldn't have the slightest clue what you were looking for or how to find it. Your post is proof.. So let me ask what information does the FBI not posses that you fine imperative to your screeching.

I'm your huckleberry.

Dazzle me with your brilliance. I'll personally go toe to toe with you in DFIR and investigation knowledge.

We'll start with this: You and @BowlBrother85 are pooping on the usage of "evidence".

 

[DC_Vol]

I say they impeach....I certainly hope they do.
If I'm wrong, I'll come on here and admit that once again I was wrong.
If they do impeach and you are wrong, you do the same.

I hope they keep up the charade. It’s basically a Trump Pence 2020 campaign contribution.

 

[volfanjustin]

@Orange_Crush

This will ignore anything that falls under the umbrella of being simply "an influence campaign" such as facebook memes and fake news and so forth. This includes the evidence contained in the ODNI's (Office of the Director of National Intelligence) declassified assessment of "Russian activities and intentions in recent U.S. elections"..

• Computer hackers affiliated with the Russian military intelligence service (GRU) infiltrated information systems of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Clinton Campaign officials, notably Chairman John Podesta, and publicly released stolen files and emails through DCLeaks, Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks during the election campaign.
• The GRU hacked into "the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC)". As a result, the GRU obtained hundreds of thousands of hacked documents, and the GRU proceeded by arranging releases of damaging hacked material via the WikiLeaks organization and also, GRU's personas "DCLeaks" and "Guccifer 2.0".
• The GRU using the names "Cozy Bear" and "Fancy Bear" gained access to the computer network of the Democratic National Committee in July of 2015 and maintained it until June of 2016, when they began leaking the stolen information via the Guccifer 2.0 online persona.
• In June and July of 2016, cybersecurity experts and firms, including CrowdStrike, Fidelis, FireEye, Mandiant, SecureWorks and Symantec all stated that the DNC hacks were part of a series of cyberattacks on the DNC committed by Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear.
• During the summer and fall of 2016, Russian hackers intruded into voter databases and software systems in 39 different states, alarming Obama administration officials to the point that they took the unprecedented step of contacting Moscow directly via the Moscow/Washington hotline and warning that the attacks could risk setting off a broader conflict.
• In September of 2016, US Department of Homeland Security officials and the National Association of Secretaries of State announced that hackers had penetrated or sought to penetrate, the voter registration systems in more than 20 states over the previous few months. Federal investigators attributed these attempts to Russian government sponsored hackers and more specifically Russian intelligence agencies. Four of the intrusions into voter registration databases were successful, including intrusions into the Illinois and Arizona databases, although the hackers did not appear to change or manipulate any data. Illinois officials stated that information on up to 200,000 registered voters was stolen.

So the FBI took Crowdstrikes word for it

 

[BowlBrother85]

So the FBI took Crowdstrikes word for it

I would assume the FBI conducted their own investigation... and before you go making insinuations about CrowdStrike - they are the cybersecurity firm of the House GOP Campaign Committee.