The Impeachment Thread

#34,654
#34,654
I’ve seen this question talked about now in two different articles . If the republicans retake the House in the next elections , do they then have the power to repeal or expunge the impeachment of Trump ?
 
#34,657
#34,657
evillawyer said:


I officially vote for changing the spelling of his name to Doucheshitz.
Click to expand...

Kenneth Starr said virtually the same thing in 1998 while pursuing the impeachment of Bill Clinton. There is a hypocritical statement from 1998 for most of Trump's defenders... including Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell.
 
#34,658
#34,658
evillawyer said:
He has done a complete 180 on his position. Not unheard of, but he can't protest that he's not on team Trump and he's just swooping in to defend the Constitution.
Click to expand...

Or in March Nancy and her dentures saying that there must be bipartisan support for impeachment?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#34,659
#34,659
BowlBrother85 said:
Kenneth Starr said virtually the same thing in 1998 while pursuing the impeachment of Bill Clinton. There is a hypocritical statement from 1998 for most of Trump's defenders... including Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell.
Click to expand...

In 98 there was a specific crime. Big difference
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#34,662
#34,662
vols40 said:
In 98 there was a specific crime. Big difference
Click to expand...
Didn't you read what Trump's new attorney, Alan Dershowitz, said back in '98? There doesn't have to be a specific crime.

"You don't need a technical crime." - Alan Dershowitz, speaking to Larry King on August 24th, 1998.
 
#34,665
#34,665
vols40 said:
Ok Nancy convince 67 people to remove or zip your pihole
Click to expand...
You want to change the subject away from Trump's attorneys (Ken Starr and Alan Dershowitz) whose positions on the Constitution are flexible depending on who they are working for. I don't blame you. There isn't a good way to explain that.
 
#34,666
#34,666
BowlBrother85 said:
You want to change the subject away from Trump's attorneys (Ken Starr and Alan Dershowitz) whose positions on the Constitution are flexible depending on who they are working for. I don't blame you. There isn't a good way to explain that.
Click to expand...

It's not mouth breathers who lap up DNC talking points they are speaking to. Get over it you had 3 plus years and how many millions of dollars and come up with what you did? Don't be mad at anyone but your liberal fools. 5 years is a long time. LMAO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#34,670
#34,670
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and vols40
#34,671
#34,671
volfanhill said:
The same can be said about Dem leadership then and now.
Click to expand...
Cite some quotes then... What I mostly remember from 1998, is that Democrats did acknowledge that Clinton had lied... and that he had even lied under oath. They just argued that it did not rise to being an impeachable offense, and that it didn't justify his removal from office. That is not the same argument that Trump's defenders are making.
 
#34,673
#34,673
BowlBrother85 said:
Cite some quotes then... What I mostly remember from 1998, is that Democrats did acknowledge that Clinton had lied... and that he had even lied under oath. They just argued that it did not rise to being an impeachable offense, and that it didn't justify his removal from office. That is not the same argument that Trump's defenders are making.
Click to expand...

Selective outrage. Clinton lied under oath no second hand fake whistle blower had to tell us that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#34,674
#34,674
BowlBrother85 said:
Cite some quotes then... What I mostly remember from 1998, is that Democrats did acknowledge that Clinton had lied... and that he had even lied under oath. They just argued that it did not rise to being an impeachable offense, and that it didn't justify his removal from office. That is not the same argument that Trump's defenders are making.
Click to expand...

Bet you’d wished you’d held off on this until after you read my link on what Jerry said . Lol
 
#34,675
#34,675
BowlBrother85 said:
You want to change the subject away from Trump's attorneys (Ken Starr and Alan Dershowitz) whose positions on the Constitution are flexible depending on who they are working for. I don't blame you. There isn't a good way to explain that.
Click to expand...

Face it. Go ahead and say it out loud to yourself. The Dems will not now not ever get 67 people to go along with this nonsense. LMAO. Times are always good when liberals are rendered meaningless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and W.TN.Orange Blood
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top