The Impeachment Thread

Charge in 2013. Then flew to Russia. Stayed in the airport for a month. And then was given Asylum for one year. Each year since this has been granted on one year basis. Some have reported that this could end in 2020.

This Eric Snowden. What is it with the name Eric and whistle blowers
 
Not very many. The Obama era was mostly pretty quiet. You had the "Fast and Furious" practice of allowing licensed firearms dealers to sell weapons to Mexican drug cartel leaders so they could later arrest them. Holder didn't cooperate with the investigation. The Benghazi embassy attack wasn't as much a scandal as it was a public relations debacle. Hillary Clinton floated a phony motive to deflect from the obvious motive, of it being a planned for the anniversary of 9/11... So no, I disagree with your premise. The Obama Administration had much less drama...
I think there was more than 2 issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and 0nelilreb
Not very many. The Obama era was mostly pretty quiet. You had the "Fast and Furious" practice of allowing licensed firearms dealers to sell weapons to Mexican drug cartel leaders so they could later arrest them. Holder didn't cooperate with the investigation. The Benghazi embassy attack wasn't as much a scandal as it was a public relations debacle. Hillary Clinton floated a phony motive to deflect from the obvious motive, of it being a planned for the anniversary of 9/11... So no, I disagree with your premise. The Obama Administration had much less drama...
I don't think Hillary, Obama, or the IC knew it was a planned attack. The shortcomings during the Benghazi Operation pre, post, and during could have been highlighted by one investigation though. It wouldn't have mattered if Hillary sent in the Calvary or not, it was going to be a scandal. What was the final verdict, It was a covert arms deal setup by the US Ambassador in a country fighting a civil war after we helped overthrow their leader?
 
I don't think Hillary, Obama, or the IC knew it was a planned attack. The shortcomings during the Benghazi Operation pre, post, and during could have been highlighted by one investigation though. It wouldn't have mattered if Hillary sent in the Calvary or not, it was going to be a scandal. What was the final verdict, It was a covert arms deal setup by the US Ambassador in a country fighting a civil war after we helped overthrow their leader?
And the Administration obfuscated and tried to bury culpability because BHO was up for relection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I think there was more than 2 issues.

The new line will probably be something like. Well, there were only two Obama Administration disasters/investigations going on at one time. Probably amended to "an average of only" ... like down to a dull roar of something below three admitted ones at any one time, and some of those have been combined "for clarity".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb
Did you have a dozen pictures taken with Magnum P.I. as well as a video recorded with you talking to him, in varying locales over the course of a year? Did your son, daughter and son-in-law also have their pictures taken with him? If so, then I would believe that you knew him.

You guys are trying to make this evidence seem more random and isolated than it obviously is... and in the process, you look really pathetic and stupid. You really would defend Trump for anything. Trump said that he didn't know Lev Parnas, didn't know anything about him and had never spoken to him. Trump flat out lied. END/
It doesn't matter what half baked 'witness' you come up with. DJT aint getting removed from office. Deal with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolStrom and AM64
Does anyone actually believe the Senate is going to convict? I'm not even sure the two charges stand up to what the Constitution determines to be impeachable offenses. Abuse of power is a vague charge, and obstruction of Congress is laughable. We've seen a President that actually committed clearly defined crimes not be convicted when Clinton got off. What makes anyone believe such vague charges will actually lead to conviction, especially in a GOP controlled Senate? Trump may very well be a douche bag, but the way to get him out of office is to vote him out.

This entire process has been a sham.
 
Does anyone actually believe the Senate is going to convict? I'm not even sure the two charges stand up to what the Constitution determines to be impeachable offenses. Abuse of power is a vague charge, and obstruction of Congress is laughable. We've seen a President that actually committed clearly defined crimes not be convicted when Clinton got off. What makes anyone believe such vague charges will actually lead to conviction, especially in a GOP controlled Senate? Trump may very well be a douche bag, but the way to get him out of office is to vote him out.

This entire process has been a sham.

They won’t vote to convict and for arguments sake let’s say they did, Trump is still eligible to run for a second term. I predict no conviction and we take back the house in November which in turn will lead to a vote to “expunge” this BS partisan Pelosi jizz stain...
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolStrom

Quote from the Article: "Democrats have liar Adam Schiff and a bunch of House nitwits against Trump's legal team of seasoned lawyers". "It should be interesting watching Schiff & Democrats push their nonsense on the Trump Defense Attorneys". It's gonna be a fun time watching the Dems meltdown even further if that's even possible to do......Democrats are such stupid morons......It's hard to believe they can dress themselves each day.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: vols40 and AM64
Advertisement

Back
Top