C-south
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2018
- Messages
- 32,974
- Likes
- 57,855
No. There is no "uniform core curriculum" that can meet the needs of over 50 million different students. Backgrounds, abilities and learning needs are quite varied. One-size does not fit all
I honestly don't know where this conversation started but I'll leave it with this....no one is attempting to dictate methods or style and any fear of that is unwarranted.
I've also been involved with education on multiple levels for 25+ years (including curriculum development and review, plus rewriting and leveling standards for what seemed to be the sole purpose of making them different from the national standards.). I know how "national" and "federal" are instantly portrayed as bad by many, solely for political reasons.
With No Child Left Behind, we have already have a uniform curriculum because schools "teach" to the test. As far as my idea, all students learning in the US should have x units of math, x units of English, etc. I think it's important to shoot for everyone having the same exposure to the same material.
With No Child Left Behind, we have already have a uniform curriculum because schools "teach" to the test. As far as my idea, all students learning in the US should have x units of math, x units of English, etc. I think it's important to shoot for everyone having the same exposure to the same material.
The only part of curriculum specific to a given location is history/social studies.
Not all students need the same # of units of math, english, etc. If the goal is same level of minimum proficiency then there are many pathways to get there and a set approach or even # of courses means some students will get left behind (need more of those topics) while some are underserved because their time is being wasted with contented they've already sufficiently mastered.