Velo Vol
Internets Expert
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2009
- Messages
- 37,309
- Likes
- 17,840
I disagree. There’s a clear difference between using a broken process to implement a policy that the president thinks is beneficial to the country vs. using a broken process to invite a foreign state to investigate somebody who is running for your job and compromising American interests to make sure they do it. Neither is good but only one is corrupt.
Knowing you, I'm 100% positive you don't have it correct.So let me make sure I have this correct ( I read it twice to make sure ) . As long as a president “ thinks “ a process is “ broken “ he’s doing something for the good of the country , even though he literally by law can’t do it , doesn’t have the power to do it , says publicly he knows he can’t do it , does it anyway ...that’s not corruption ? That’s what I was referring to earlier about perception .
Did you just make the case for Trump's impeachment?So let me make sure I have this correct ( I read it twice to make sure ) . As long as a president “ thinks “ a process is “ broken “ , and he’s doing something for the good of the country , even though he literally by law can’t do it , doesn’t have the power to do it , says publicly he knows he can’t do it , does it anyway ...that’s not corruption ? That’s what I was referring to earlier about perception .