The FBI Director and the assistant AG have told the WH not to release the memo

#101
#101
lawgator1 said:
The White House claims that it is going through the process of an honest review of the memo before release. However, when Trump found out that the doj was trying to block release, he started screaming at people on Air Force One. And, last night, when asked he said 100% he was going to release the memo. The whole thing is such a charade.
Click to expand...

Ha...."screaming at people" huh? I doubt that happened at all. Sounds like you're making things up as usual.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#102
#102
lawgator1 said:
It discusses the info used to obtain FISA warrants which foreign intelligence services do not know we have and which they might be able to trace once they figure it out.
Click to expand...

You do realize they can release the memo while leaving certain parts of it classified, right? So if there's anything that would actually effect national security, that part of the memo can be ommitted, while the rest is released, and it happens all the time.

Although 90% of material is overclassified.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#103
#103
Vol0725 said:
Got that on tape?
Click to expand...

:lol:

You have to trace it back to the source.

1) it's LG. He has no credibility here. You cannot trust the info he puts out. Always verify and look for the spin. Guy is a gump and a 100% party first guy.

2) he cites news sources who for the past year have grossly distorted the truth and misstated rumors and opinions as facts. Rarely will there be a retraction. And the same here...LG and the boys make a lot of noise and act outraged....until the next mistruth is pedaled by the media. Rinse and repeat. The media has destroyed their reputation over the last year. They cannot be trusted to do actual journalism.

3). The media pedals whatever the Democrats vomit at their feet.
 
#104
#104
No surprise the compromised FBI is attacking #ReleaseTheMemo. @RealDonaldTrump has some more house cleaning to do...

Don't believe the Deep State on #ReleasetheMemo-concerns about classified info are fake, Deep State Obama/DOJ/FBI use classification to cover-up abuses. @JudicialWatch wants full transparency-in fed court now for Clinton dossier docs, FBI anti-@RealDonaldTrump texts, etc.


Judicial Watch 🔎‏Verified account
@JudicialWatch
Follow Follow @JudicialWatch

More

After the infamous #Clinton-#Lynch tarmac meeting, docs obtained by Judicial Watch show the #FBI worked to cover it up. The Bureau's leaders seemed concerned not about the scandalous meeting itself, but instead about the whistleblower who got the word out.
 
#107
#107
Vol8188 said:
You do realize they can release the memo while leaving certain parts of it classified, right? So if there's anything that would actually effect national security, that part of the memo can be ommitted, while the rest is released, and it happens all the time.

Although 90% of material is overclassified.
Click to expand...

No. LG doesn't realize that. I doubt that he's a lawyer at all w/things he puts out there w/no knowledge on his posting material.
He likes to throw thoughts of speculation out there hoping it will stick.
 
Last edited:
#108
#108
Vol8188 said:
You do realize they can release the memo while leaving certain parts of it classified, right? So if there's anything that would actually effect national security, that part of the memo can be ommitted, while the rest is released, and it happens all the time.

Although 90% of material is overclassified.
Click to expand...


What about the material not included? Which explains all of the verifying info that was used in the FISA process?

The memo is designed to give the impression that the process relied solely or too much on the dossier. You can't meaningfully even discuss that without knowing the other information relied upon.
 
#109
#109
lawgator1 said:
What about the material not included? Which explains all of the verifying info that was used in the FISA process?

The memo is designed to give the impression that the process relied solely or too much on the dossier. You can't meaningfully even discuss that without knowing the other information relied upon.
Click to expand...

But you can meaningfully discuss what's in it? Gone from FL lawyer to congressman now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#110
#110
Thank God that Trump, Nunes, and the people helping them with this stunt are too stupid to cover their tracks.

When the Dems take at least the House, and subpoena them all, the criminal conduct of the Nunes gang will be exposed. He's just too stupid to realize it now.
 
#111
#111
lawgator1 said:
Thank God that Trump, Nunes, and the people helping them with this stunt are too stupid to cover their tracks.

When the Dems take at least the House, and subpoena them all, the criminal conduct of the Nunes gang will be exposed. He's just too stupid to realize it now.
Click to expand...

By 2030 nobody will care.
 
#114
#114
lawgator1 said:
What about the material not included? Which explains all of the verifying info that was used in the FISA process?

The memo is designed to give the impression that the process relied solely or too much on the dossier. You can't meaningfully even discuss that without knowing the other information relied upon.
Click to expand...

So you agree the memo's release won't be an issue of national security?
 
#116
#116
"We have grave concerns about the material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo's accuracy." the FBI said in a statement.

In other words, Nunes and Co. have "cherry picked" their information just as Schiff said and items included in the memo lack necessary context. I've never seen the head of a Congressional committee in charge of an independent investigation act as aggressively in the role of a White House subordinate as Nunes has. What if Sam Ervin or Howard Baker had conducted themselves this way during Watergate? There would have been a calamitous Constitutional crisis. Nunes isn't trying to expose any hidden truth. He is doing whatever he thinks is necessary to run political cover for the White House.
 
#117
#117
BowlBrother85 said:
"We have grave concerns about the material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo's accuracy." the FBI said in a statement.

In other words, Nunes and Co. have "cherry picked" their information just as Schiff said and items included in the memo lack necessary context. I've never seen the head of a Congressional committee in charge of an independent investigation act as aggressively in the role of a White House subordinate as Nunes has. What if Sam Ervin or Howard Baker had conducted themselves this way during Watergate? There would have been a calamitous Constitutional crisis. Nunes isn't trying to expose any hidden truth. He is doing whatever he thinks is necessary to run political cover for the White House.
Click to expand...

Unless the grave concerns are from the people suspected of wrongdoing.

These FBI people are already implicated

James Comey - ex FBI Director, lawyer up 1/23
Andrew McCabe - FBI Deputy Director, removed 1/29
Peter Strzok - FBI Chief, lawyer up 1/23
Lisa Page - FBI lawyer- affair w/ Strzok
James Rybicki - FBI Chief of Staff, resigned 1/23

Safe bet that house cleaning at FBI isn't done yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#119
#119
ajvol01 said:
Unless the grave concerns are from the people suspected of wrongdoing.

These FBI people are already implicated

James Comey - ex FBI Director, lawyer up 1/23
Andrew McCabe - FBI Deputy Director, removed 1/29
Peter Strzok - FBI Chief, lawyer up 1/23
Lisa Page - FBI lawyer- affair w/ Strzok
James Rybicki - FBI Chief of Staff, resigned 1/23

Safe bet that house cleaning at FBI isn't done yet.
Click to expand...

It's Christopher Wray's statement. (a Trump appointee)
 
#124
#124
BowlBrother85 said:
"We have grave concerns about the material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo's accuracy." the FBI said in a statement.

In other words, Nunes and Co. have "cherry picked" their information just as Schiff said and items included in the memo lack necessary context. I've never seen the head of a Congressional committee in charge of an independent investigation act as aggressively in the role of a White House subordinate as Nunes has. What if Sam Ervin or Howard Baker had conducted themselves this way during Watergate? There would have been a calamitous Constitutional crisis. Nunes isn't trying to expose any hidden truth. He is doing whatever he thinks is necessary to run political cover for the White House.
Click to expand...

Rest assured, it’s coming out. And it should, don’t buy the resistance rhetoric.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top