OrangeByBirth
Old time Vol
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2009
- Messages
- 4,311
- Likes
- 4,584
Jones beats losing coaches, not winners. This has been his pattern at Cincy, and UT. So it makes sense that losing or underperforming coaches that lose to Jones eventually lose their jobs.
What you are observing is a correlation, not a cause effect.
If that's the case, then he's milked that formula for multiple conference championships, a coach of the year award, and a head coaching position at a top-10 all-time power school. He's such a terrible coach.Jones beats losing coaches, not winners. This has been his pattern at Cincy, and UT. So it makes sense that losing or underperforming coaches that lose to Jones eventually lose their jobs.
What you are observing is a correlation, not a cause effect.
Jones beats losing coaches, not winners. This has been his pattern at Cincy, and UT. So it makes sense that losing or underperforming coaches that lose to Jones eventually lose their jobs.
What you are observing is a correlation, not a cause effect.
Jones beats losing coaches, not winners. This has been his pattern at Cincy, and UT. So it makes sense that losing or underperforming coaches that lose to Jones eventually lose their jobs.
What you are observing is a correlation, not a cause effect.
Too late now.
It seems that losing to Butch Jones has become a curse for head coaches. Every 'big' game Jones has won at UT has resulted in the coach retiring, being fired, or finding the hot seat. Even Ferentz was on life support during the off season.
Time to go get Nick SaTan and Jim McElwain!
Go Big Orange!
Jones beats losing coaches, not winners. This has been his pattern at Cincy, and UT. So it makes sense that losing or underperforming coaches that lose to Jones eventually lose their jobs.
What you are observing is a correlation, not a cause effect.
2 exceptions do not make a rule. Look at the entire record.