I guess it will be good enough to compete for the regular season every year as long as no one regresses, or gets hurt and hits to their fullest potentialAside from the lack of current prospects (which can and should be addressed in the next several drafts) what’s wrong with this approach? It is different and unusual, but it’s not as if we’ve made long term commitments to a team full of scrubs. Nobody twisted any arms for the players to commit to the contracts they signed, but it’s a sound move for the organization so long as player performance continues at the current levels.
It's the difference between having LM as your owners and Cohen. Cohen knows the Mets have a short window and are probably going to need a rebuild. LM sees the revenue from the battery, and wants to keep it. LM doesn't care about championships they want profit, Coehn wants a title.I guess it will be good enough to compete for the regular season every year as long as no one regresses, or gets hurt and hits to their fullest potential
It's the difference between having LM as your owners and Cohen. Cohen knows the Mets have a short window and are probably going to need a rebuild. LM sees the revenue from the battery, and wants to keep it. LM doesn't care about championships they want profit, Coehn wants a title.
DO YOU THINK THE PRICES ARE GONNA GO DOWN?I can’t blame AA for saying “nah I’ll sit this one out” when prices went up $80M for elite players. I’ll go with our core for the next 5-7 years.
But swinging for the fences now leaves AA with nothing to work with at the trade deadline to patch a hole or mend an injury(see Duval). I’m ok with the moves so far, and like everyone else, would like to see an upgrade in LF.Barely dipping into the luxury tax to extend your own core, is a little bit different then swinging for the fences with Elite players.