Same here, I wouldn't have minded and would've even defended him still if this had just somehow turned up in an ncaa investigation somehow. Am not happy with how this has been handled though
What the F is SI doing running a headline that says "Foster took money" in a story that says Foster took tacos? What the hell kind of journalism is that?
If he says he took cash in the documentary, why not print that in the article in addition to the tacos?
What the F is SI doing running a headline that says "Foster took money" in a story that says Foster took tacos? What the hell kind of journalism is that?
If he says he took cash in the documentary, why not print that in the article in addition to the tacos?
What the F is SI doing running a headline that says "Foster took money" in a story that says Foster took tacos? What the hell kind of journalism is that?
If he says he took cash in the documentary, why not print that in the article in addition to the tacos?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.