The Atlanta Braves Thread (Terry Pendleton Edition)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've never been graced with Jimmy Johns. The Gargantuan sounds like a sandwich id like to tackle

It's not HUGE, like a footlong or anything. Probably a 8-9 inch roll. It's just packed full of goodness.

Still not hungry yet. The family all ate dinner three hours ago.
 
Last edited:
On Thursday, it was revealed that Ortiz had changed his story. Ortiz had repeatedly said Hernandez and Wallace, alleged to be Hernandez's "right-hand man," both got out of the car they were in with Lloyd before Ortiz heard shots ring out. Ortiz now says only Hernandez and Lloyd got out.

Hernandez is gonna walk, you guys.
 
We hold the tie breaker with the Cards, correct? So even though we came into tonight tied with them for the NL's best record, it's really more like a one game lead, right?
 
Horse sh**

Cops are going for first degree murder with Hernandez as the shooter. They've got three bad guys in the car, one of whom is their witness; the other two of whom will tell a different, coordinated story. (Hernandez is paying for the other guy's defense.) The prosecution's witness is a career criminal who can't get his story straight.

The narrative told by the defense is going to be that the three guys took him out to the industrial park just planning to rough the victim up, but something went wrong and somebody shot him, and then Hernandez engaged in a panicked coverup. The prosecution will have a terrible witness and no way to prove who the shooter was. It should be child's play for a skilled defense attorney to create reasonable doubt in a jury's mind when the prosecution is going for 1st degree murder.
 
I'd like to know what an Actual Law Enforcement Professional like GWN thinks about it, but I feel pretty sure that I haven't watched 40 years of cop shows on TV for nothing.
 
It's still too soon to say, but it certainly doesn't look good. A good defense attorney will rape and pillage a witness for a change in testimony, so he better have a really good story as to why he changed up. At that point it just comes down to whether or not the jury finds him credible.

I would be equally concerned at this point in not having the murder weapon. Also the fact that there's been so many new indictments lately could possibly indicate that the prosecution is trying to drum up a more credible witness.

Who knows. Like I said, it's still early.
 
I will also say this...I have personally seen juries come to verdicts that defied all semblance of reason. There is literally no telling what they will do. I could easily see this case going either way, but I'd lean towards a guilty verdict at this point.
 
It's still too soon to say, but it certainly doesn't look good. A good defense attorney will rape and pillage a witness for a change in testimony, so he better have a really good story as to why he changed up. At that point it just comes down to whether or not the jury finds him credible.

I would be equally concerned at this point in not having the murder weapon. Also the fact that there's been so many new indictments lately could possibly indicate that the prosecution is trying to drum up a more credible witness.

Who knows. Like I said, it's still early.

"We know somebody in that car is guilty, but we can't prove which one" worked out pretty well for Ray Lewis. I'm not optimistic about how it's going to turn out if they can't find the gun.
 
This is what I could have been watching instead of the Braves game. I can't decide if I missed something wonderful or horrible or both.

BVNt_nlCEAA_ivT.png:large
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top