05_never_again
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 25,718
- Likes
- 23,772
I don't think they were good relative to what they could have been, let me put it that way. They are really talented guys, so a year where they underachieve is better that a lot of other lines, but still disappointing. Of the 3 on that line, Arvy definitely is the overachiever. He did have a good goalscoring year, and Johansen did have a bunch of assists, more than he's ever had, actually. Like I said above, Forsberg, as good as he is, still seems like he has some kind of untapped potential. I think he's good enough to be a consistent point-per-game player and in some years score 40+ goals.True re: the record.
What I’m asking is what constitutes a good season for that line lol? I though they had a good solid season, not great. You said they weren’t good.
At some point maybe we should expect Forsberg to be what he is, a really talented hockey player. If he played with the consistency of who he is when at his best, he is a top 3 player in the world. That is what separates AO and SC from the mortals. I think Forsberg will have a 40 goal year or two, maybe three. But I don’t think he is good enough to consistently put out those numbers. And that’s OK lol. Still will go down as our best player OAT. But again, not the highest bar.
I think what constitutes a good season for that line goes beyond just what numbers they put up. I didn't see this season, for extended stretches, JOFA give other teams fits, and in the playoffs they were invisible. They weren't a consistent force that other teams had to reckon with. They seemed to play less than the sum of their parts, as did the entire team. That's why I said I didn't think they were all that good, relatively speaking.