NO SIR EEE
The Sultan Of Swat
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2011
- Messages
- 5,941
- Likes
- 18,579
I mean your opponent's running back or wide receiver is fighting for extra yardage and you get leverage while he's fighting, it's not okay to use it to your advantage? I don't believe that. Some penalties are soft as hell.Hits are part of the game of football.
Suplexes and body slams belong in the WWE.
People can get necks broken being positioned as when slammed.
Football is a dangerous sport any way.
I mean your opponent's running back or wide receiver is fighting for extra yardage and you get leverage while he's fighting, it's not okay to use it to your advantage? I don't believe that. Some penalties are soft as hell.
Theo flag was picked up as in a penalty was never called. It’s one thing to hit hard and tackle tough, but you can’t just pick up a player suplex him anymore and dumb on his head. Theo tackle was on the natural motion of the play and he keeps driving with his legs. Banks on the other hand wasn’t in his natural motion when he suplexed him to the ground like he was in WWE.I know these didn't make a difference at all, but I've been racking my brain trying to figure out why flags are thrown on these? Tackling aggressively is flag worthy? I guess I can understand targeting flags on the targeting side of things when those calls happen (even though I don't agree with it)
I don't agree with the rules, but I guess I'll have to live with em.Theo flag was picked up as in a penalty was never called. It’s one thing to hit hard and tackle tough, but you can’t just pick up a player suplex him anymore and dumb on his head. Theo tackle was on the natural motion of the play and he keeps driving with his legs. Banks on the other hand wasn’t in his natural motion when he suplexed him to the ground like he was in WWE.
Thought Banks was justified, not so on Jacksons.I know these didn't make a difference at all, but I've been racking my brain trying to figure out why flags are thrown on these? Tackling aggressively is flag worthy? I guess I can understand targeting flags on the targeting side of things when those calls happen (even though I don't agree with it)
I know these didn't make a difference at all, but I've been racking my brain trying to figure out why flags are thrown on these? Tackling aggressively is flag worthy? I guess I can understand targeting flags on the targeting side of things when those calls happen (even though I don't agree with it)
You are correct, I do not remember hearing a whistle.If the ref doesn't want someone to get body slammed, then he is free to blow the whistle and stop the play when the player's momentum is stopped. Banks had stopped the guy and no whistle had been blown, so he picked him up and made sure he went to the ground.
Very simple... ACC Officials.... midway through the 4th quarter Pitt had 1 penalty, UT 11. The PI on UT in the end zone was well over the receivers head and well out of the endzone - uncatchable. Move the ball inside the hashes then measure, inches short. Pitt right tackle was continuously hooking our end, no call for the same move Wright was called for the only time he did it.I know these didn't make a difference at all, but I've been racking my brain trying to figure out why flags are thrown on these? Tackling aggressively is flag worthy? I guess I can understand targeting flags on the targeting side of things when those calls happen (even though I don't agree with it)
It has not always been a penalty. That statement would be false. Why would you respect someone with different colors on?C'mon Man. Argument for argument's sake? You can't pick a guy up and slam him! Always been a PF, and it should be worthy of ejection. Shows lack of respect for everyone, including your teammates .